American journal of ophthalmology · 2018
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping With Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Normal and Diseased Cornea Eyes.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sella Ruti, Zangwill Linda M, Weinreb Robert N, Afshari Natalie A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the epithelial thickness mapping (ETM) of the iVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) device (Optovue Inc, Fremont, California, USA) in normal and diseased cornea eyes.
DESIGN: Reliability and validity analysis.
METHODS: Sixty eyes of 60 subjects were recruited for the study, which included normal subjects (n = 12) and patients with corneal diseases (12 patients each: dry eye syndrome [DES], contact lens wear, post-laser refractive surgery, and keratoconus). Three repeated scans were acquired on 3 iVue SD-OCTs with device-designated operators from consented subjects. Each subject was scanned on each device. Repeatability (based on random error of repeated scans) and reproducibility (including the random error and the instrument/operator variability) were assessed based on spatial zones derived from a 6-mm-diameter corneal ETM centered on the pupil and compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine eyes qualified for final analysis. Seventy-one of 598 acquired scans (11.9%) were excluded owing to scan quality concerns. The percentage of disqualified scans was similar across normal (10.7%) and diseased eyes (12.1%). Of 527 qualified scans, 40 (7.6%) scans required manual edits of the segmentation lines. Repeatability and reproducibility results were similar, indicating minimal device/operator variability for both groups. Repeatability and reproducibility were similar in all subgroups of cornea patients, excluding the DES group, for which reproducibility was significantly lower (range 3.2%-5.5% for DES patients and 1.1%-2.9% for normal subjects).
CONCLUSIONS: The iVue SD-OCT provides good corneal ETM repeatability and reproducibility in normal and diseased cornea eyes through all map zones.
DESIGN: Reliability and validity analysis.
METHODS: Sixty eyes of 60 subjects were recruited for the study, which included normal subjects (n = 12) and patients with corneal diseases (12 patients each: dry eye syndrome [DES], contact lens wear, post-laser refractive surgery, and keratoconus). Three repeated scans were acquired on 3 iVue SD-OCTs with device-designated operators from consented subjects. Each subject was scanned on each device. Repeatability (based on random error of repeated scans) and reproducibility (including the random error and the instrument/operator variability) were assessed based on spatial zones derived from a 6-mm-diameter corneal ETM centered on the pupil and compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine eyes qualified for final analysis. Seventy-one of 598 acquired scans (11.9%) were excluded owing to scan quality concerns. The percentage of disqualified scans was similar across normal (10.7%) and diseased eyes (12.1%). Of 527 qualified scans, 40 (7.6%) scans required manual edits of the segmentation lines. Repeatability and reproducibility results were similar, indicating minimal device/operator variability for both groups. Repeatability and reproducibility were similar in all subgroups of cornea patients, excluding the DES group, for which reproducibility was significantly lower (range 3.2%-5.5% for DES patients and 1.1%-2.9% for normal subjects).
CONCLUSIONS: The iVue SD-OCT provides good corneal ETM repeatability and reproducibility in normal and diseased cornea eyes through all map zones.