DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.12.022
Transepithelial corneal crosslinking for keratoconus.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of corneal crosslinking (CXL) using a transepithelial technique for the treatment of keratoconus.
SETTING
Cornea and refractive surgery subspecialty practice.
DESIGN
Prospective case series.
METHODS
Transepithelial CXL was performed in keratoconic eyes using riboflavin 0.1% and topical anesthetic containing benzalkonium chloride to facilitate riboflavin diffusion through the epithelium. Eyes were randomized to receive riboflavin administration either every 1 minute or every 2 minutes during ultraviolet-A exposure at 3mW/cm2. The principal outcome was change in maximum keratometry (K) and secondary outcomes included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, mean K, and comparison of randomized groups.
RESULTS
Eighty-two eyes of 56 patients were treated. At 1 year, maximum K decreased significantly by 0.45 diopters (D) ± 1.94 (SD); it improved by 2.0 D or more in 11 eyes (13%) and worsened by 2.0 D or more in 4 eyes (5%). The mean UDVA significantly improved by 0.7 lines, whereas the CDVA improved by 0.2 lines. Two eyes showed both continued progression with loss of CDVA. Only the 1-minute subgroup showed significant improvements in maximum K (-0.73 D) and UDVA. Transient corneal erosion and epitheliopathy were reported in 21% of eyes.
CONCLUSIONS
Transepithelial CXL resulted in significant improvements in maximum K and UDVA over 1 year. There was a suggestion that increased riboflavin dosing might improve procedure outcomes. Further study is required to determine the relative advantages and disadvantages of different transepithelial approaches to the standard CXL protocol with epithelial removal.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.