Journal of cardiology · 2023
Differences in clinical and echocardiographic features and outcomes between atrial functional mitral regurgitation patients with and without posterior mitral leaflet bending.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Okamoto Hiroki, Miyake Makoto, Hayashi Atsushi, Matsutani Hayato, Tamura Toshihiro, Nakagawa Yoshihisa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Posterior mitral leaflet (PML) bending is a cause of atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR). We aimed to investigate differences in clinical and echocardiographic features and outcomes between AFMR patients with and without PML bending.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined 118 AFMR patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), mild or greater MR without degenerative mitral valve changes, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50 %. Patients were classified by the presence of PML bending: PML bending (n=24) and no PML bending (n=94). PML bending was defined as PML-to-anterior mitral leaflet angle ratio ≥3.1 calculated using receiver operating characteristics analysis for eccentric MR jet toward left atrial posterior wall. The study endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, admission for heart failure, and mitral valve surgery.
RESULTS: Overall, a total of 88 patients (75 %) had mild MR. There were no between-group differences in clinical and echocardiographic characteristics including AF duration and cardiac cavities size except for the length of inward bending of the left ventricular posterobasal wall and the mitral annular area. The 36-month event-free survival for the composite endpoint was significantly lower in the PML bending group (63 % vs. 78 %; Log-rank p=0.047). In multivariate analysis, PML bending was also associated with the composite outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: AFMR patients with PML bending may have worse outcomes than those without PML bending despite similar clinical features.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined 118 AFMR patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), mild or greater MR without degenerative mitral valve changes, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50 %. Patients were classified by the presence of PML bending: PML bending (n=24) and no PML bending (n=94). PML bending was defined as PML-to-anterior mitral leaflet angle ratio ≥3.1 calculated using receiver operating characteristics analysis for eccentric MR jet toward left atrial posterior wall. The study endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, admission for heart failure, and mitral valve surgery.
RESULTS: Overall, a total of 88 patients (75 %) had mild MR. There were no between-group differences in clinical and echocardiographic characteristics including AF duration and cardiac cavities size except for the length of inward bending of the left ventricular posterobasal wall and the mitral annular area. The 36-month event-free survival for the composite endpoint was significantly lower in the PML bending group (63 % vs. 78 %; Log-rank p=0.047). In multivariate analysis, PML bending was also associated with the composite outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: AFMR patients with PML bending may have worse outcomes than those without PML bending despite similar clinical features.