Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology · 2022
Secondary mitral regurgitation: Maintaining coherence with the American Society of Echocardiography grading guidelines, which proportionality concept best predicts prognosis in the real world?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Presume João, Lopes Pedro, Freitas Pedro, Albuquerque Francisco, Reis Carla, Horta Eduarda, Marta Liliana, Guerreiro Sara, Trabulo Marisa, Abecasis João, de Araújo Gonçalves Pedro, Almeida Manuel, Canada Manuel, Mendes Miguel, Andrade Maria João, Ribeiras Regina
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Proportionality of secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) may be a key factor in deciding whether a patient may benefit from mitral intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of two different concepts of proportionality and assess their ability to improve MR stratification proposed by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<50%) and at least mild sMR. Proportionality status was calculated using formulas proposed by a) Grayburn et al. - disproportionate sMR defined as EROALVEDV >0.14; b) Lopes et al. - disproportionate sMR whenever measured EROA>theoretical EROA (determined as 50%×LVEF×LVEDVMitralVTI). Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 572 patients (69±12 years; 76% male) were included. Mean LVEF was 33±9%, with a median left ventricular end-diastolic volume of 174 mL [136;220] and a median effective regurgitant orifice area of 14 mm2 [8;22]. During mean follow-up of 4.1±2.7 years, there were 254 deaths. There was considerable disagreement (p<0.001) between both formulas: of 96 patients with disproportionate sMR according to Lopes' criteria, 46 (48%) were considered proportionate according to Grayburn's; and of 62 patients with disproportionate sMR according to Grayburn's, 12 (19%) were considered proportionate according to Lopes' formula. In multivariate analysis, only Lopes' definition of disproportionate sMR maintained independent prognostic value (hazard ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.07-2.1, p=0.018) and improved the risk stratification of ASE sMR classification.
CONCLUSION: Of the two formulas available to define disproportionate sMR, Lopes' model emerged as the only one with independent prognostic value while improving the risk stratification proposed by the ASE guidelines.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<50%) and at least mild sMR. Proportionality status was calculated using formulas proposed by a) Grayburn et al. - disproportionate sMR defined as EROALVEDV >0.14; b) Lopes et al. - disproportionate sMR whenever measured EROA>theoretical EROA (determined as 50%×LVEF×LVEDVMitralVTI). Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 572 patients (69±12 years; 76% male) were included. Mean LVEF was 33±9%, with a median left ventricular end-diastolic volume of 174 mL [136;220] and a median effective regurgitant orifice area of 14 mm2 [8;22]. During mean follow-up of 4.1±2.7 years, there were 254 deaths. There was considerable disagreement (p<0.001) between both formulas: of 96 patients with disproportionate sMR according to Lopes' criteria, 46 (48%) were considered proportionate according to Grayburn's; and of 62 patients with disproportionate sMR according to Grayburn's, 12 (19%) were considered proportionate according to Lopes' formula. In multivariate analysis, only Lopes' definition of disproportionate sMR maintained independent prognostic value (hazard ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.07-2.1, p=0.018) and improved the risk stratification of ASE sMR classification.
CONCLUSION: Of the two formulas available to define disproportionate sMR, Lopes' model emerged as the only one with independent prognostic value while improving the risk stratification proposed by the ASE guidelines.