Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD · 2022
Comparative evaluation of biodentine and endosequence root repair material as direct pulp capping material: A clinical study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parikh Margi, Kishan Karkala Venkappa, Shah Nimisha Chinmay, Parikh Maitry, Saklecha Purnima
Аннотация
AIM: The study was designed to clinically evaluate biodentine and endosequence root repair material (ERRM) as direct pulp capping agent at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months intervals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed.
RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%.
CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty permanent posterior teeth with deep caries, without any signs of irreversible pulpitis were allotted into two experimental groups: Group I -Biodentine, Group II-ERRM. Follow-up evaluations were done. Every 24 h for 7 days, the pain was assessed using visual analog scale.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test along with Pearson's Chi-square test was performed.
RESULTS: The success rate of clinical assessment at 12 months for biodentine group is 78.60% and ERRM Group is 64.70%.
CONCLUSION: Biodentine group performed superior than ERRM group clinically at all-time interval and hence it can be successfully used to restore exposed vital tooth.