European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2024
Impact of virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional modeling on time to surgery in mandibular reconstruction by free fibula flap.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Villarmé A, Pace-Loscos Tanguy, Schiappa Renaud, Poissonnet Gilles, Dassonville Olivier, Chamorey Emmanuel, Bozec Alexandre, Culié Dorian
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Mandible reconstruction using a free fibula flap (FFF) is preferably performed with virtual surgical planning (VSP) to potentially improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. However, VSP is time-consuming. This study aims to assess the impact of VSP on time to surgery (TS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent FFF for oral cavity cancer between 2007 and 2020 were included. Time to surgery (from the date of the first consultation to the surgery date) was compared between patients without VSP and with VSP. In our department, VSP and 3D modeling were performed by an external engineering laboratory.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients were included retrospectively. VSP was utilized for 90 patients (55%). The mean time to surgery was 31 ± 16 days for patients undergoing conventional surgery without VSP and 44 ± 19 days for patients with VSP (p < 0.001). No clinical or tumoral characteristic were associated with a TS extended, except for the utilization of VSP (p < 0.001). By constituting groups of 25 consecutive patients, there is no difference in TS between the groups.
CONCLUSION: The use of VSP significantly increased the time to surgery in our study, unrelated to clinical differences or year of surgery. This delay may have an impact on oncologic outcomes, so it should be considered in the care organization for each patient. Implementing new procedures to reduce this difference is warranted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent FFF for oral cavity cancer between 2007 and 2020 were included. Time to surgery (from the date of the first consultation to the surgery date) was compared between patients without VSP and with VSP. In our department, VSP and 3D modeling were performed by an external engineering laboratory.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients were included retrospectively. VSP was utilized for 90 patients (55%). The mean time to surgery was 31 ± 16 days for patients undergoing conventional surgery without VSP and 44 ± 19 days for patients with VSP (p < 0.001). No clinical or tumoral characteristic were associated with a TS extended, except for the utilization of VSP (p < 0.001). By constituting groups of 25 consecutive patients, there is no difference in TS between the groups.
CONCLUSION: The use of VSP significantly increased the time to surgery in our study, unrelated to clinical differences or year of surgery. This delay may have an impact on oncologic outcomes, so it should be considered in the care organization for each patient. Implementing new procedures to reduce this difference is warranted.