Journal of digestive diseases · 2024
Comparison between SeHCAT test and clinical response to cholestyramine in patients with chronic diarrhea and high suspicion of bile acid malabsorption: A single-center prospective study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schiepatti Annalisa, Bossert Irene, Cincotta Marta, Zanini Carolina Arianna, Maimaris Stiliano, D'Ambrosio Daniela, Trifirò Giuseppe, Biagi Federico
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the clinical response to cholestyramine in patients with functional chronic diarrhea and a high clinical suspicion of bile-acid diarrhea (BAD) investigated with 75-selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) test.
METHODS: Adult patients attending our outpatient clinic between January and December 2021 for chronic diarrhea with suspicion of BAD were proposed SeHCAT testing and a therapeutic trial of cholestyramine 4-8 g daily. Clinical response to cholestyramine was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical and demographic data were analyzed according to SeHCAT test results.
RESULTS: Among the 50 patients with chronic diarrhea and clinical suspicion of BAD, 13 (26.0%) refused either SeHCAT testing or cholestyramine therapy. Finally, 37 patients (31 females, age 44 ± 14 years) agreed to undergo SeHCAT and were started on cholestyramine (median follow-up 14 months [interquartile range 6-16 months]). Initial response to cholestyramine was similar in patients with positive and negative SeHCAT test results, but improved over time in those with a positive test result. Long-term response (100% vs 65.2%, P = 0.02) and necessity of maintenance therapy for symptom control were more common in those with positive SeHCAT test result (71.4% vs 26.1%, P = 0.02). However, response to cholestyramine was also frequent in patients with a negative test result.
CONCLUSIONS: The SeHCAT test accurately identifies patients with BAD who benefit from long-term cholestyramine treatment. Nevertheless, cholestyramine may be also effective in patients with chronic diarrhea but negative SeHCAT test result.
METHODS: Adult patients attending our outpatient clinic between January and December 2021 for chronic diarrhea with suspicion of BAD were proposed SeHCAT testing and a therapeutic trial of cholestyramine 4-8 g daily. Clinical response to cholestyramine was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical and demographic data were analyzed according to SeHCAT test results.
RESULTS: Among the 50 patients with chronic diarrhea and clinical suspicion of BAD, 13 (26.0%) refused either SeHCAT testing or cholestyramine therapy. Finally, 37 patients (31 females, age 44 ± 14 years) agreed to undergo SeHCAT and were started on cholestyramine (median follow-up 14 months [interquartile range 6-16 months]). Initial response to cholestyramine was similar in patients with positive and negative SeHCAT test results, but improved over time in those with a positive test result. Long-term response (100% vs 65.2%, P = 0.02) and necessity of maintenance therapy for symptom control were more common in those with positive SeHCAT test result (71.4% vs 26.1%, P = 0.02). However, response to cholestyramine was also frequent in patients with a negative test result.
CONCLUSIONS: The SeHCAT test accurately identifies patients with BAD who benefit from long-term cholestyramine treatment. Nevertheless, cholestyramine may be also effective in patients with chronic diarrhea but negative SeHCAT test result.