Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2024
Intestinal adaptation and rehabilitation in adults with short bowel syndrome.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pironi Loris
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the past decade, trophic gastrointestinal hormonal factors have been included in the intestinal rehabilitation programs for short bowel syndrome (SBS). Up today the only trophic factor approved for clinical practice is the glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analogue, teduglutide. A literature review on the last 2-year data on GLP-2 analogues for the treatment of SBS in adults has been performed.
RECENT FINDINGS: Several reports on real-world data on the efficacy and safety of teduglutide treatment for SBS, some case-reports on the use of teduglutide in non-SBS conditions as well as phase 2 trials on new GL-2 analogues on patients with SBS have been retrieved.
SUMMARY: Real-world data confirmed the teduglutide efficacy not only in weaning off IVS in accurately selected patients but also increased the alert on the risk of development of gastrointestinal polyps related to the drug; the impact of the therapy on patients' QoL deserves further studies and the cost-utility of the treatment is still uncertain. Some case reports highlighted the potential benefit of treatment with teduglutide in non-SBS gastrointestinal diseases, such as graft-versus-host disease, primary amyloidosis and refractory microscopic colitis. Phase 2 RCTs on safety and efficacy of two new long-acting GLP-2 analogues, glepaglutide and apraglutide, were published, and phase 3 RCTs have been completed.
RECENT FINDINGS: Several reports on real-world data on the efficacy and safety of teduglutide treatment for SBS, some case-reports on the use of teduglutide in non-SBS conditions as well as phase 2 trials on new GL-2 analogues on patients with SBS have been retrieved.
SUMMARY: Real-world data confirmed the teduglutide efficacy not only in weaning off IVS in accurately selected patients but also increased the alert on the risk of development of gastrointestinal polyps related to the drug; the impact of the therapy on patients' QoL deserves further studies and the cost-utility of the treatment is still uncertain. Some case reports highlighted the potential benefit of treatment with teduglutide in non-SBS gastrointestinal diseases, such as graft-versus-host disease, primary amyloidosis and refractory microscopic colitis. Phase 2 RCTs on safety and efficacy of two new long-acting GLP-2 analogues, glepaglutide and apraglutide, were published, and phase 3 RCTs have been completed.