European journal of internal medicine · 2014
Exaggerated exercise blood pressure response and risk of stroke in patients referred for stress testing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bouzas-Mosquera María Del Carmen, Bouzas-Mosquera Alberto, Peteiro Jesús, Broullón Francisco J, Alvarez-García Nemesio, Castro-Beiras Alfonso
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There is some evidence to suggest that exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) may be associated with future risk of stroke in subjects without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the value of an exaggerated exercise SBP response (EESBPR) for predicting stroke in patients referred for stress testing for clinical reasons has not been investigated.
METHODS: We evaluated a community-based sample of 10,047 patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent treadmill exercise echocardiography. An EESBPR was defined as a peak exercise SBP of >220mmHg. The ratio of the increase in SBP during exercise to exercise workload (ΔSBPeEW) was also estimated. The endpoints were stroke of any type, ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. Median follow-up was 3.5years.
RESULTS: Annualized rates of stroke of any type, ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke were 0.6% (95% CI 0.53-0.67), 0.49% (95% CI 0.42-0.56) and 0.12% (95% CI 0.09-0.15) in patients without EESBPR vs. 0.69% (95% CI 0.37-1), 0.49% (95% CI 0.23-0.76) and 0.19% (95% CI 0.02-0.35) in those with EESBPR (p=0.68, 0.90 and 0.39, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant univariate association between ΔSBPeEW and the occurrence of any endpoint. In multivariate analysis, hypertension, male sex, age, diabetes mellitus and resting SBP remained predictors of stroke of any type. EESBPR and ΔSBPeEW were not predictors of any of the endpoints evaluated.
CONCLUSION: We did not observe any significant association between exercise SBP and the future occurrence of stroke in patients with known or suspected CAD referred for exercise echocardiography.
METHODS: We evaluated a community-based sample of 10,047 patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent treadmill exercise echocardiography. An EESBPR was defined as a peak exercise SBP of >220mmHg. The ratio of the increase in SBP during exercise to exercise workload (ΔSBPeEW) was also estimated. The endpoints were stroke of any type, ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. Median follow-up was 3.5years.
RESULTS: Annualized rates of stroke of any type, ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke were 0.6% (95% CI 0.53-0.67), 0.49% (95% CI 0.42-0.56) and 0.12% (95% CI 0.09-0.15) in patients without EESBPR vs. 0.69% (95% CI 0.37-1), 0.49% (95% CI 0.23-0.76) and 0.19% (95% CI 0.02-0.35) in those with EESBPR (p=0.68, 0.90 and 0.39, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant univariate association between ΔSBPeEW and the occurrence of any endpoint. In multivariate analysis, hypertension, male sex, age, diabetes mellitus and resting SBP remained predictors of stroke of any type. EESBPR and ΔSBPeEW were not predictors of any of the endpoints evaluated.
CONCLUSION: We did not observe any significant association between exercise SBP and the future occurrence of stroke in patients with known or suspected CAD referred for exercise echocardiography.