MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215112000370

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2012

A false aneurysm.

Mitchell D, Repanos C, Coman W B

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We report a case of a remaining hemi-thyroid following laryngectomy, which was misinterpreted as a pseudoaneurysm.

METHODS

Case report and comment on this understandable error which is easily avoidable.

RESULTS

A 59-year-old man had undergone salvage laryngectomy for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, which had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Three months after his laryngectomy, he presented with a sore neck and subcutaneous collections. Computed tomography revealed a unilateral mass with high signal contrast uptake anterior to the left common carotid artery, which was thought initially to be a carotid pseudoaneurysm. Further investigation, including ultrasonography and a review by the senior head and neck radiologist, demonstrated that this mass was actually the remnant hemi-thyroid preserved at laryngectomy (which is often misshapen compared with a normal hemi-thyroid). The collections were found to be recurrent tumour, and unnecessary further interventions were avoided.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography easily distinguishes between a thyroid remnant and a pseudoaneurysm. Furthermore, the opinion of an experienced head and neck radiologist may be vital when interpreting complex post-surgical head and neck radiology.

Для цитирования: Mitchell D, Repanos C, Coman W B. A false aneurysm.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2012. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215112000370.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.