Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm follow-up: when the phone rings. Changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and patient satisfaction. Experience in 30 health centers in Spain.
Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ortuzar Ariana, Fox María Laura, Vera Juan Antonio, Lorenzo Vizcaya Álvaro, Marín Sánchez Alberto, Llopis Calatayud Inmaculada, Carbonell Sara, Álvarez-Larrán Alberto, Mata Serna Raquel, Marco Buades Josefa E, Quiroz Cervantes Keina, Martínez Hellín Ángela, Blum Domínguez Alejandra, Caballero Navarro Gonzalo, Cáceres Sansaloni Amparo, Guerrero Fernández Lucía, Muñoz Linares Cristina, Gasior Kabat Mercedes, Pérez López Raúl, Fernández Rodríguez Ángeles, Martínez Bilbao Cristina, Cobo Rodríguez María Teresa, Díaz Álvaro, Durán M Antonia, Santaliestra Tomas Marta, García-Gutierrez Valentín, Magro Mazo Elena, Hernández-Boluda Juan Carlos, Segura Adrián, Raya José María, Navas Elorza Begoña, Osorio Santiago
Аннотация
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has favored the expansion of telemedicine. Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPN) might be good candidates for virtual follow-up. In this study, we aimed to analyze the follow-up of patients with Ph-MPN in Spain during COVID-19, its effectiveness, and acceptance among patients. We present a multicenter retrospective study from 30 centers. Five hundred forty-one patients were included with a median age of 67 years (yr). With a median follow-up of 19 months, 4410 appointments were recorded. The median of visits per patient was 7 and median periodicity was 2.7 months; significantly more visits and a higher frequency of them were registered in myelofibrosis (MF) patients. 60.1% of visits were in-person, 39.5% were by telephone, and 0.3% were videocall visits, with a predominance of telephone visits for essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) patients over MF, as well as for younger patients (< 50 yr). The proportion of phone visits significantly decreased after the first semester of the pandemic. Pharmacological modifications were performed only in 25.7% of the visits, and, considering overall management, ET patients needed fewer global treatment changes. Telephone contact effectiveness reached 90% and only 5.4% required a complementary in-person appointment. Although 56.2% of the cohort preferred in-person visits, 90.5% of our patients claimed to be satisfied with follow-up during the pandemic, with an 83% of positive comments. In view of our results, telemedicine has proven effective and efficient, and might continue to play a complementary role in Ph-MPN patients' follow-up.