Oral diseases · 2025
Remote Consultations for Monitoring Actinic Cheilitis: A Preliminary Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.
СтатьяКлиническое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Israel Mônica Simões, Freire Nathália de Almeida, Rodrigues Bruno Teixeira Gonçalves, Dias Yasmin Muniz, Martins Manoela Domingues, de Sousa Carlos Augusto Moreira, Carrard Vinicius Coelho
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of remote consultation for monitoring actinic cheilitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-over, non-randomized clinical trial comparing remote and in-person consultations for patients with actinic cheilitis. During the remote consultations, patients were interviewed and submitted clinical photos taken with smartphones. Local signs and symptoms were recorded, and examiners assessed whether a biopsy was indicated. Photos sent by patients were compared with those taken during the in-person visits.
RESULTS: The study included 36 patients. The most frequent clinical presentation was plaques with erosive areas. Agreement between remote and in-person evaluations regarding clinical alterations was 97% or higher. In 11% of cases (n = 4), both examiners recommended biopsy. In only 2 cases (5.6%), the remote examiner considered an in-person consultation necessary. Photos taken by patients were rated as adequate in 88.6% of cases, compared to 97.1% for professional photos, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.16).
CONCLUSION: Teledentistry showed promising results for the follow-up of actinic cheilitis and may help reduce healthcare costs. However, due to its potentially malignant nature, initial assessment must be performed by an oral medicine specialist to ensure appropriate diagnosis and management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-over, non-randomized clinical trial comparing remote and in-person consultations for patients with actinic cheilitis. During the remote consultations, patients were interviewed and submitted clinical photos taken with smartphones. Local signs and symptoms were recorded, and examiners assessed whether a biopsy was indicated. Photos sent by patients were compared with those taken during the in-person visits.
RESULTS: The study included 36 patients. The most frequent clinical presentation was plaques with erosive areas. Agreement between remote and in-person evaluations regarding clinical alterations was 97% or higher. In 11% of cases (n = 4), both examiners recommended biopsy. In only 2 cases (5.6%), the remote examiner considered an in-person consultation necessary. Photos taken by patients were rated as adequate in 88.6% of cases, compared to 97.1% for professional photos, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.16).
CONCLUSION: Teledentistry showed promising results for the follow-up of actinic cheilitis and may help reduce healthcare costs. However, due to its potentially malignant nature, initial assessment must be performed by an oral medicine specialist to ensure appropriate diagnosis and management.