Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2017
Diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell complex substructures in different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elbendary Amal M, Abd El-Latef Mohamed Hafez, Elsorogy Hisham I, Enaam Kamal M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of substructure of ganglion cell complex versus peripapillary nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in different stages of glaucoma.
METHODS: Thirty eyes were normal, 120 were glaucomatous. Glaucomatous eyes were classified into: early glaucoma (46), moderate glaucoma (48), and severe glaucoma (26). Perimetry and SD-OCT were done. Peripapillary NFL thickness, ganglion cell layer (GCL), macular NFL thickness, combined GCL and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC), were recorded. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) was used to verify performance of different OCT parameters.
RESULTS: Peripapillary NFL, GCL, and GCC thickness values were significantly different in all stages of glaucoma. All comparisons were significantly different; normal versus early, early versus moderate and moderate versus severe. The best parameters that distinguished normal from early stage were: peripapillary NFL (AUC: 0.90), GCC (AUC: 0.75), early from moderate stage were: peripapillary NFL thickness (AUC: 0.85), GCL (0.81),GCC (0.81), moderate from severe stage were: GCC (AUC:0.95), macular NFL (AUC:0.91), GCL (AUC:0.89), and peripapillary NFL (AUC:0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: Peripapllary NFL and GCC thinning showed paradoxical course. The most diagnosed parameter in early glaucoma was peripapillary NFL and in severe glaucoma was GCC. In severe glaucoma, macular NFL showed higher diagnostic power than GCL and peripapillary NFL. Ganglion cell complex mapping may provide good alternative to optic disc imaging in advanced glaucoma with poor fixation.
METHODS: Thirty eyes were normal, 120 were glaucomatous. Glaucomatous eyes were classified into: early glaucoma (46), moderate glaucoma (48), and severe glaucoma (26). Perimetry and SD-OCT were done. Peripapillary NFL thickness, ganglion cell layer (GCL), macular NFL thickness, combined GCL and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC), were recorded. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) was used to verify performance of different OCT parameters.
RESULTS: Peripapillary NFL, GCL, and GCC thickness values were significantly different in all stages of glaucoma. All comparisons were significantly different; normal versus early, early versus moderate and moderate versus severe. The best parameters that distinguished normal from early stage were: peripapillary NFL (AUC: 0.90), GCC (AUC: 0.75), early from moderate stage were: peripapillary NFL thickness (AUC: 0.85), GCL (0.81),GCC (0.81), moderate from severe stage were: GCC (AUC:0.95), macular NFL (AUC:0.91), GCL (AUC:0.89), and peripapillary NFL (AUC:0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: Peripapllary NFL and GCC thinning showed paradoxical course. The most diagnosed parameter in early glaucoma was peripapillary NFL and in severe glaucoma was GCC. In severe glaucoma, macular NFL showed higher diagnostic power than GCL and peripapillary NFL. Ganglion cell complex mapping may provide good alternative to optic disc imaging in advanced glaucoma with poor fixation.