Journal of ophthalmology · 2017
Structure and Function Relationship of Activated Retinal Glia in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nützi Christoph, Schötzau Andreas, Grieshaber Matthias C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate clinically activated retinal astrocytes and Müller cells (ARAM) regarding retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
METHODS: Central visual field (VF; i.e., retinal sensitivity) was measured with a custom-made macular pattern by microperimetry and correlated with the presence (ARAM+) or absence (ARAM-) of ARAM on red-free fundus photography and with the corresponding RNFL by optical coherence tomography (OCT).
RESULTS: In the eyes of POAG patients, ARAM+ had overall a significantly lower retinal sensitivity (ARAM+: 7.34 dB, ARAM-: 11.9 dB; p < 0.001) and lower RNFL thickness in the inferior peripapillary quadrants compared to ARAM- (RNFL superior: ARAM+ 74.2 μm, ARAM- 77.5 μm; RNFL temporal: ARAM+ 46.8 μm, ARAM- 53.0 μm, p < 0.001; and RNFL inferior: ARAM+ 63.2 μm, ARAM- 73.1 μm, p < 0.001). Within the same eye, ARAM+ showed a lower retinal sensitivity compared to ARAM- ([ARAM- (11.13 dB)] - [ARAM+ (9.56 dB) = 1.57 dB; p = 0.25). The proportion of ARAM+ per eye correlated strongly with reduced retinal light sensitivity (p = 0.02), corresponding lower peripapillary RNFL thickness (p = 0.02), and lower RNFL temporal quadrant thickness (p < 0.01), but not with greater age (p = 0.45).
CONCLUSION: ARAM was more frequently identified in the eyes with a lower retinal sensitivity and peripapillary RNFL thickness and may be a clinical sign in the macula for an advanced stage of POAG.
METHODS: Central visual field (VF; i.e., retinal sensitivity) was measured with a custom-made macular pattern by microperimetry and correlated with the presence (ARAM+) or absence (ARAM-) of ARAM on red-free fundus photography and with the corresponding RNFL by optical coherence tomography (OCT).
RESULTS: In the eyes of POAG patients, ARAM+ had overall a significantly lower retinal sensitivity (ARAM+: 7.34 dB, ARAM-: 11.9 dB; p < 0.001) and lower RNFL thickness in the inferior peripapillary quadrants compared to ARAM- (RNFL superior: ARAM+ 74.2 μm, ARAM- 77.5 μm; RNFL temporal: ARAM+ 46.8 μm, ARAM- 53.0 μm, p < 0.001; and RNFL inferior: ARAM+ 63.2 μm, ARAM- 73.1 μm, p < 0.001). Within the same eye, ARAM+ showed a lower retinal sensitivity compared to ARAM- ([ARAM- (11.13 dB)] - [ARAM+ (9.56 dB) = 1.57 dB; p = 0.25). The proportion of ARAM+ per eye correlated strongly with reduced retinal light sensitivity (p = 0.02), corresponding lower peripapillary RNFL thickness (p = 0.02), and lower RNFL temporal quadrant thickness (p < 0.01), but not with greater age (p = 0.45).
CONCLUSION: ARAM was more frequently identified in the eyes with a lower retinal sensitivity and peripapillary RNFL thickness and may be a clinical sign in the macula for an advanced stage of POAG.