Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
Predicting chemotherapy-induced thrombotoxicity by NARX neural networks and transfer learning.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Steinacker Marie, Kheifetz Yuri, Scholz Markus
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a common side effect of cytotoxic chemotherapies, which is often dose-limiting. Predicting an individual's risk is of high clinical importance, as otherwise, a small subgroup of patients limits dosages for the overall population for safety reasons.
METHODS: We aim to predict individual platelet dynamics using non-linear auto-regressive networks with exogenous inputs (NARX). We consider different architectures of the NARX networks, namely feed-forward networks (FNN) and gated recurrent units (GRU). To cope with the relative sparsity of individual patient data, we employ transfer learning (TL) approaches based on a semi-mechanistic model of hematotoxicity. We use a large data set of patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma to learn the respective models on an individual scale and to compare prediction performances with that of the semi-mechanistic model.
RESULTS: Of the examined network models, the NARX with GRU architecture performs best. In comparison to the semi-mechanistic model, the network model can result in a substantial improvement of prediction accuracy for patients with irregular dynamics, given well-spaced measurements. TL improves individual prediction performances.
CONCLUSION: NARX networks can be utilized to predict an individual's thrombotoxic response to cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment. For reasonable model learning, we recommend at least three well-spaced measurements per cycle: at baseline, during the nadir phase and during the recovery phase. We aim at generalizing our approach to other treatment scenarios and blood lineages in the future.
METHODS: We aim to predict individual platelet dynamics using non-linear auto-regressive networks with exogenous inputs (NARX). We consider different architectures of the NARX networks, namely feed-forward networks (FNN) and gated recurrent units (GRU). To cope with the relative sparsity of individual patient data, we employ transfer learning (TL) approaches based on a semi-mechanistic model of hematotoxicity. We use a large data set of patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma to learn the respective models on an individual scale and to compare prediction performances with that of the semi-mechanistic model.
RESULTS: Of the examined network models, the NARX with GRU architecture performs best. In comparison to the semi-mechanistic model, the network model can result in a substantial improvement of prediction accuracy for patients with irregular dynamics, given well-spaced measurements. TL improves individual prediction performances.
CONCLUSION: NARX networks can be utilized to predict an individual's thrombotoxic response to cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment. For reasonable model learning, we recommend at least three well-spaced measurements per cycle: at baseline, during the nadir phase and during the recovery phase. We aim at generalizing our approach to other treatment scenarios and blood lineages in the future.