Differential diagnosis of leukoplakia versus lichen planus of the oral mucosa based on digital texture analysis in intraoral photography.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
A noninvasive, accurate and quick diagnosis is very important to general practitioners and specialists who care for the health of patients' oral cavity mucosa. The main enemies are precancerous lesions: leukoplakia and lichen planus (LP).
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to attempt to formulate a differential diagnosis for leukoplakia vs LP in the oral mucosa based on digital texture analysis in intraoral macrophotography.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
The study was comprised of 21 patients affected by leukoplakia, 21 affected by LP and 21 healthy volunteers. Intraoral photography of all participants was taken perpendicularly to the buccal mucosa. To achieve the maximum possible contrast, a high-pass filter was applied and level tools were then used to equalize the histograms of the images. After that, the images were converted into 8-bit grayscale. Two features of run length matrix and 2 of co-occurrence matrix were used for texture analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to check for differences. Factor analysis (FA) and classification with artificial neural network (ANN) were performed.
RESULTS
The results revealed a simple possible differentiation of both types of precancerous lesions from normal mucosa (p < 0.05). Factor analysis and ANN can help in differentiating the 3 study groups from one another.
CONCLUSIONS
Differential diagnosis of leukoplakia and LP in the oral mucosa based on digital texture analysis in intraoral macrophotography is possible. It can be used to develop smartphone applications and can be also a helpful tool for general dentists to define the clinical problem before a consultation with a specialist.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.