Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ward Sloane O, Gupta Puranjay, Kurup Shreya, Lee Maximillian Y, Yettapu Dipankar, Rajput Rohit, Truong Amy, Sandberg Madeline, Dujovny Jonah, Mazmudar Aditya S, Sayari Arash J, Park Daniel K, Singh Kern
Аннотация
Background: Body mass index (BMI) is an important consideration in perioperative evaluation. High BMI is correlated with more comorbidities and poorer operative outcomes; however, there is limited literature on the impact of BMI on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after multilevel cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and PROMs in two-level CDR. Methods: A single-surgeon database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent two-level CDR between August 2017 and October 2024. Patients were stratified as non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2; n = 44) or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2; n = 34). The final analytic cohort included 78 patients. Mean follow-up was 7.65 ± 5.53 months. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also analyzed. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Results: Obese patients had a higher CCI than non-obese patients (0.90 ± 1.06, 1.87 ± 1.31, p = 0.001). Patient-reported outcomes were collected and analyzed after controlling for hypertension, diabetes, CCI scores, and age. At the final postoperative follow-up, only VR12-MCS differed, with the obese cohort having worse scores (60.7 ± 5.0 versus 53.9 ± 10.2, p = 0.040). MCID achievement rates did not differ between groups across PROMs (p > 0.183 for all). Conclusion: Patients with and without obesity demonstrated comparable early-to-midterm PROM trajectories and MCID achievement following two-level CDR. These findings suggest that obesity was not associated with substantially different patient-reported recovery during the observed follow-up period.