Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE HEIGHT OF WIDE AND NARROW PRIMARY MACULAR STAPHYLOMA AND MYOPIC MACULAR RETINOSCHISIS.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
García-Ben Antonio, Fernández Martín Marta, Olivier Pascual Nuria, Arroyo Castillo Rosa, Rubio Cid Sara, Ortigueira Espinosa Rafael, Álvarez Díaz María Dolores
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the depth of wide and narrow primary macular staphyloma and myopic macular retinoschisis.
METHODS: Sixty-nine highly myopic eyes with wide and narrow primary macular staphyloma were included in this cross-sectional study and classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of myopic macular retinoschisis on swept-source optical coherence tomography. All patients received a complete ophthalmologic examination with determination of macular staphyloma depth by ocular ultrasonography (B-scan).
RESULTS: Nine eyes (9/69, 13.04%) present myopic macular retinoschisis on swept-source optical coherence tomography. Eyes with vitreomacular tractions, arteriolar traction, and greater macular staphyloma depth were more likely to develop myopic macular retinoschisis (odds ratio, 11.32; P = 0.001; odds ratio, 6.23; P = 0.039; and odds ratio, 3.37; P = 0.01, respectively). We did not observe statistically significant differences regarding best-corrected visual acuity between eyes with and without myopic macular retinoschisis ( P = 0.39).
CONCLUSION: The depth of the wide and narrow primary macular staphyloma appears to be a new and an important factor in the development of myopic macular retinoschisis.
METHODS: Sixty-nine highly myopic eyes with wide and narrow primary macular staphyloma were included in this cross-sectional study and classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of myopic macular retinoschisis on swept-source optical coherence tomography. All patients received a complete ophthalmologic examination with determination of macular staphyloma depth by ocular ultrasonography (B-scan).
RESULTS: Nine eyes (9/69, 13.04%) present myopic macular retinoschisis on swept-source optical coherence tomography. Eyes with vitreomacular tractions, arteriolar traction, and greater macular staphyloma depth were more likely to develop myopic macular retinoschisis (odds ratio, 11.32; P = 0.001; odds ratio, 6.23; P = 0.039; and odds ratio, 3.37; P = 0.01, respectively). We did not observe statistically significant differences regarding best-corrected visual acuity between eyes with and without myopic macular retinoschisis ( P = 0.39).
CONCLUSION: The depth of the wide and narrow primary macular staphyloma appears to be a new and an important factor in the development of myopic macular retinoschisis.