Journal francais d'ophtalmologie · 2024
Comparison of the IOL Master and Pentacam in the measurement of anterior segment parameters in patients with high myopia and cataracts.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li L, Li Y-J, Liu M, Yu F-L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the differences between the Zeiss IOL Master and Oculus Pentacam in keratometry and central anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in patients with high myopia and cataracts.
METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2020, 89 patients (103 eyes) with cataracts and high myopia who underwent preoperative cataract evaluation at Nanchang First Hospital were selected for retrospective analysis. Keratometry (K1, K2) and ACD were measured with the IOL Master and Pentacam. Paired t-tests were performed to compare the differences, while the Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the agreement.
RESULTS: The K1 value was (43.15±2.44) D for the IOL Master and (42.98±2.47) D for the Pentacam, and the difference between the two instruments was statistically significant (P<0.01). The K2 value was (44.55±2.63) D for the IOL Master and (44.32±2.55) D for the Pentacam. The ACD was (3.44±0.33)mm for the IOL Master and (3.39±0.36)mm for the Pentacam. There were statistically significant differences between the two instruments in both keratometry and ACD (P<0.01). The absolute values of the maximum difference between the two instruments for K1 and K2 were 1.1 and 1.07; thus, the consistency of the two instruments with respect to this measurement was poor. However, the absolute value of the maximum difference between the two instruments for ACD was 0.34, so the consistency of the two instruments in relation to this measurement was good.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the IOL Master and the Pentacam can be used in the measurement of keratometry and ACD in patients with high myopia and cataracts, but the keratometry measurements should be compared in clinical application.
METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2020, 89 patients (103 eyes) with cataracts and high myopia who underwent preoperative cataract evaluation at Nanchang First Hospital were selected for retrospective analysis. Keratometry (K1, K2) and ACD were measured with the IOL Master and Pentacam. Paired t-tests were performed to compare the differences, while the Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the agreement.
RESULTS: The K1 value was (43.15±2.44) D for the IOL Master and (42.98±2.47) D for the Pentacam, and the difference between the two instruments was statistically significant (P<0.01). The K2 value was (44.55±2.63) D for the IOL Master and (44.32±2.55) D for the Pentacam. The ACD was (3.44±0.33)mm for the IOL Master and (3.39±0.36)mm for the Pentacam. There were statistically significant differences between the two instruments in both keratometry and ACD (P<0.01). The absolute values of the maximum difference between the two instruments for K1 and K2 were 1.1 and 1.07; thus, the consistency of the two instruments with respect to this measurement was poor. However, the absolute value of the maximum difference between the two instruments for ACD was 0.34, so the consistency of the two instruments in relation to this measurement was good.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the IOL Master and the Pentacam can be used in the measurement of keratometry and ACD in patients with high myopia and cataracts, but the keratometry measurements should be compared in clinical application.