MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00066-1

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2001

Value and cost evaluation of routine follow-up for patients with clinical stage I/II endometrial cancer.

Morice P, Levy-Piedbois C, Ajaj S, Pautier P, Haie-Meder C, Lhomme C, Duvillard P, Castaigne D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The aim of the study was to determine the value and the costs of routine follow-up for the detection of recurrences in patients treated for endometrial cancer. Between 1986 and 1995, 390 women with clinical stage I/II endometrial carcinoma were treated with combined surgery-radiation therapy. After treatment, follow-up was based on the clinical examination, a systematic Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and radiography (chest X-ray and abdomino-pelvic ultrasonography). 27 patients relapsed: 22 patients had symptoms and 5 were asymptomatic. None of the patients had recurrence detected on the routine Pap smear nor on the systematic chest X-ray. In conclusion, the follow-up of patients treated for endometrial cancer based on routine Pap smears and systematic radiography does not permit earlier detection of recurrences. Follow-up should simply include a clinical examination whose frequency should be based on prognostic factors. Approximately two-thirds of this cost was due to systematic examinations (Pap smears and radiography). Our results indicate that such expenditure could be avoided.

Для цитирования: Morice P, Levy-Piedbois C, Ajaj S, Pautier P, Haie-Meder C, Lhomme C, Duvillard P, Castaigne D. Value and cost evaluation of routine follow-up for patients with clinical stage I/II endometrial cancer.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00066-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.