Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
Clinicopathologic features and genomic profiling of female axillary lymph node metastases from adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Liansha, Zhu Yueting, Du Yang, Long Xiangyu, Long Yixiu, Tang Yuan, Liu Jiyan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Axillary lymph node metastases from adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary (CUPAx) is a rare disease in women. This retrospective study intended to examine the clinicopathological features of CUPAx and compared CUPAx genetically with axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancer (BCAx), investigating differences in their biological behavior.
METHODS: We conducted the clinical and prognostic analysis of 58 CUPAx patients in West China Hospital spanning from 2009 to 2021. Gemonic profiling of 12 CUPAx patients and 16 BCAx patients was conducted by the FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) platform. Moreover, we also compared the gene mutation spectrum and relevant pathways between the two groups and both TCGA and COSMIC databases.
RESULTS: The majority of the 58 CUPAx patients were HR-/HER2- subtype. Most patients received mastectomy combined radiotherapy (50 Gy/25f). CUPAx patients who received mastectomy instead of breast-conserving surgery had a more favorable overall prognosis. Radiotherapy in chest wall/breast and supraclavicular/infraclavicular fossa was the independent prognostic factor (HR = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.00-0.93, P = 0.04). In 28 sequencing samples (CUPAx, n = 12, BCAx, n = 16) and 401 TCGA-BRCA patients, IRS2 only mutated in CUPAx (33.33%) but amplified in BCAx (11.11%) and TCGA-BRCA (1.5%). Pathway analysis revealed that BCAx had more NOTCH pathway mutations than CUPAx. Enrichment analysis showed that CUPAx enriched more in mammary development and PML bodies than BCAx, but less in the positive regulation of kinase activity.
CONCLUSIONS: More active treatment methods, like chemotherapy, mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy, could improve the prognosis of CUPAx. The differential mutation genes of CUPAx and BCAx might be associated with their respective biological behaviors like invasiveness and prognosis.
METHODS: We conducted the clinical and prognostic analysis of 58 CUPAx patients in West China Hospital spanning from 2009 to 2021. Gemonic profiling of 12 CUPAx patients and 16 BCAx patients was conducted by the FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) platform. Moreover, we also compared the gene mutation spectrum and relevant pathways between the two groups and both TCGA and COSMIC databases.
RESULTS: The majority of the 58 CUPAx patients were HR-/HER2- subtype. Most patients received mastectomy combined radiotherapy (50 Gy/25f). CUPAx patients who received mastectomy instead of breast-conserving surgery had a more favorable overall prognosis. Radiotherapy in chest wall/breast and supraclavicular/infraclavicular fossa was the independent prognostic factor (HR = 0.05, 95%CI = 0.00-0.93, P = 0.04). In 28 sequencing samples (CUPAx, n = 12, BCAx, n = 16) and 401 TCGA-BRCA patients, IRS2 only mutated in CUPAx (33.33%) but amplified in BCAx (11.11%) and TCGA-BRCA (1.5%). Pathway analysis revealed that BCAx had more NOTCH pathway mutations than CUPAx. Enrichment analysis showed that CUPAx enriched more in mammary development and PML bodies than BCAx, but less in the positive regulation of kinase activity.
CONCLUSIONS: More active treatment methods, like chemotherapy, mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy, could improve the prognosis of CUPAx. The differential mutation genes of CUPAx and BCAx might be associated with their respective biological behaviors like invasiveness and prognosis.