Annals of surgical oncology · 2008
Positive sentinel lymph nodes are a negative prognostic factor for survival in T1-2 oral/oropharyngeal cancer-a long-term study on 103 patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kovács Adorján F, Stefenelli Ulrich, Seitz Oliver, Middendorp Marcus, Diener Jürgen, Sader Robert, Grünwald Frank
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To evaluate prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OOSCC) concerning overall/disease-free survival.
METHODS: One hundred three consecutive patients with T1-2N0 OOSCC were consecutively recruited for SNB as single invasive staging method for the neck. Two hundred seventy-three sentinel nodes (SNs) were removed (mean, 2.65 per patient). Nine patients had 10 positive SNs (upstaging rate, 8.7%) found in levels I to III, leading to a therapeutic neck dissection.
RESULTS: Mean observation time of all patients was 6.7 years; mean survival time of patients with negative or positive SNs was 6.9 and 3.7 years, respectively. There has been no false-negative result of SNB to date becoming manifest in ipsilateral node metastasis during follow-up. Five-year overall/disease-free survival of all patients was 82%/72%, respectively. The same parameters for the patients with negative SNs were 85%/74%, for those with positive SNs 38%/47%, respectively (statistically significant). There has been a higher statistical risk for locoregional recurrence for patients with positive SNs. Rates of metachronous second primary tumors developing during follow-up were 10.6% (negative SNs) and 44.4% (positive SNs).
CONCLUSION: SNB was a valuable diagnostic method in patients with T1-2N0 OOSCC avoiding elective neck dissections. Patients with positive SNs had statistically significantly higher rates of locoregional recurrences, second primary tumors, tumor-related deaths, and a worse overall/disease-free survival. To date, no therapeutic consequences in case of a positive SN beyond execution of modified radical neck dissection (to remove other positive nodes) and closer attention during follow-up can be concluded from this study.
METHODS: One hundred three consecutive patients with T1-2N0 OOSCC were consecutively recruited for SNB as single invasive staging method for the neck. Two hundred seventy-three sentinel nodes (SNs) were removed (mean, 2.65 per patient). Nine patients had 10 positive SNs (upstaging rate, 8.7%) found in levels I to III, leading to a therapeutic neck dissection.
RESULTS: Mean observation time of all patients was 6.7 years; mean survival time of patients with negative or positive SNs was 6.9 and 3.7 years, respectively. There has been no false-negative result of SNB to date becoming manifest in ipsilateral node metastasis during follow-up. Five-year overall/disease-free survival of all patients was 82%/72%, respectively. The same parameters for the patients with negative SNs were 85%/74%, for those with positive SNs 38%/47%, respectively (statistically significant). There has been a higher statistical risk for locoregional recurrence for patients with positive SNs. Rates of metachronous second primary tumors developing during follow-up were 10.6% (negative SNs) and 44.4% (positive SNs).
CONCLUSION: SNB was a valuable diagnostic method in patients with T1-2N0 OOSCC avoiding elective neck dissections. Patients with positive SNs had statistically significantly higher rates of locoregional recurrences, second primary tumors, tumor-related deaths, and a worse overall/disease-free survival. To date, no therapeutic consequences in case of a positive SN beyond execution of modified radical neck dissection (to remove other positive nodes) and closer attention during follow-up can be concluded from this study.