Clinical breast cancer · 2023
Axilla View of Mammography in Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Ji, Di Wenyang, Shi Ke, Wang Siqi, Jiang Yunshan, Xu Weiwei, Zhong Zhaoyun, Pan Hong, Xie Hui, Zhou Wenbin, Zhao Meng, Wang Shui
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore a novel position of mammography named axilla view in axillary lymph node (ALN) evaluation in breast cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled and scheduled for mammography before surgery. Investigated imaging patterns included mediolateral oblique (2D-MLO) and axilla view (2D-axilla) of mammography, and axilla view of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-axilla). The correlation of ALN numbers between imaging and pathology was analyzed. Diagnostic performance was analyzed via AUC.
RESULTS: 75 patients were included. A larger and clearer axillary region was displayed in axilla view. The total number of ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO view (4.6 vs. 2.5, P < .001; 5.6 vs. 4.6, P = .034). Correlations between number of positive ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view and pathologically confirmed metastatic ALNs were stronger than 2D-MLO view (Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.7084,0.7044 and 0.4744). The proportion of cases with ≥5 positive ALNs detected under 3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO (38.2% vs. 14.7%, P = .028). The overweight and obese group showed a higher AUC value than the underweight and lean group in ALN evaluation, although not significantly (2D-MLO: 0.7643 vs. 0.6458, P = .2656; 2D-axilla: 0.8083 vs. 0.6586, P = .1522; 3D-axilla: 0.8045 vs. 0.6615, P = .1874). This difference was more pronounced in axilla view.
CONCLUSION: Axilla view exhibited advantages over conventional MLO view in the extent of axilla displayed by mammography in breast cancer. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled and scheduled for mammography before surgery. Investigated imaging patterns included mediolateral oblique (2D-MLO) and axilla view (2D-axilla) of mammography, and axilla view of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-axilla). The correlation of ALN numbers between imaging and pathology was analyzed. Diagnostic performance was analyzed via AUC.
RESULTS: 75 patients were included. A larger and clearer axillary region was displayed in axilla view. The total number of ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO view (4.6 vs. 2.5, P < .001; 5.6 vs. 4.6, P = .034). Correlations between number of positive ALNs detected under 2D/3D-axilla view and pathologically confirmed metastatic ALNs were stronger than 2D-MLO view (Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.7084,0.7044 and 0.4744). The proportion of cases with ≥5 positive ALNs detected under 3D-axilla view was significantly higher than that under 2D-MLO (38.2% vs. 14.7%, P = .028). The overweight and obese group showed a higher AUC value than the underweight and lean group in ALN evaluation, although not significantly (2D-MLO: 0.7643 vs. 0.6458, P = .2656; 2D-axilla: 0.8083 vs. 0.6586, P = .1522; 3D-axilla: 0.8045 vs. 0.6615, P = .1874). This difference was more pronounced in axilla view.
CONCLUSION: Axilla view exhibited advantages over conventional MLO view in the extent of axilla displayed by mammography in breast cancer. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.