Radiology · 1994
Is 300 msec too long for cardiac MR imaging? Feasibility study demonstrating changes in left ventricular cross-sectional area with use of single-shot turboFLASH imaging.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsuda T, Yamada H, Kida M, Sasayama S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of demonstrating cardiac motion with 313.6-msec single-shot turbo-fast low-angle shot magnetic resonance imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects of motion on single-shot images were evaluated with a phantom moving at known velocity. Single-shot images were obtained in eight healthy volunteers and four cardiac patients and compared with conventional cine images.
RESULTS: The moving phantom was visualized at the location where zero phase-encoded data were sampled. When the velocity was within the physiologic range of left ventricular wall motion (< 11 cm/sec), the full width at half maximum of the object on a 64 x 64-matrix image with a 4.9-msec repetition time was comparable with that of a stationary phantom. The left ventricular cross-sectional area determined with single-shot imaging showed good correlation with results of conventional cine imaging (r = .96) in healthy volunteers.
CONCLUSION: Single-shot imaging can be used for simple and quick assessment of cardiac function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects of motion on single-shot images were evaluated with a phantom moving at known velocity. Single-shot images were obtained in eight healthy volunteers and four cardiac patients and compared with conventional cine images.
RESULTS: The moving phantom was visualized at the location where zero phase-encoded data were sampled. When the velocity was within the physiologic range of left ventricular wall motion (< 11 cm/sec), the full width at half maximum of the object on a 64 x 64-matrix image with a 4.9-msec repetition time was comparable with that of a stationary phantom. The left ventricular cross-sectional area determined with single-shot imaging showed good correlation with results of conventional cine imaging (r = .96) in healthy volunteers.
CONCLUSION: Single-shot imaging can be used for simple and quick assessment of cardiac function.