Veterinary ophthalmology · 2019
Surgically induced astigmatism in canines following sutured dorsonasal vs dorsotemporal clear corneal incisions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pederson Samantha L, Cleymaet Allison M, Hess Ann M, Wotman Kathryn L, Freeman Kate S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate use of the Pentacam® HR for evaluation of surgically induced corneal astigmatism (SIA) in canines undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification and determine differences between dorsonasal and dorsotemporal clear corneal incisions.
ANIMALS: Client-owned canines undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification.
PROCEDURES: Patients received anterior segment imaging pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, and 2-4 months post-operatively (follow-up). Total corneal refractive power was used to determine SIA. Surgically induced astigmatism was compared between right and left eyes, representing dorsotemporal and dorsonasal incisions, respectively. Repeated measures analyses were used between time points and paired t test compared SIA between eyes.
RESULTS: Complete imaging series were obtained for seven patients. Follow-up imaging occurred at a median of 112 days (range 60-132 days) post-operatively. For repeated measures analyses, significant differences were found between pre- and immediate post-operative values (P < 0.01), and between immediate post-operative and follow-up values (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between pre-operative and follow-up values. Surgically induced astigmatism was significantly different between right and left eyes, with values of 2.01 ± 1.24 D and 3.05 ± 1.58 D at 3 mm radius (P < 0.05), and 2.04 ± 1.18 D and 3.06 ± 1.27 D at 4 mm radius (P < 0.05) for dorsotemporal and dorsonasal incisions, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary investigation revealed improvement of corneal SIA 2-4 months post-operatively, but development of significantly more SIA in dorsonasal vs dorsotemporal incisions. This prompts consideration of patient or microscope rotation to create a more dorsotemporal incision when possible.
ANIMALS: Client-owned canines undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification.
PROCEDURES: Patients received anterior segment imaging pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, and 2-4 months post-operatively (follow-up). Total corneal refractive power was used to determine SIA. Surgically induced astigmatism was compared between right and left eyes, representing dorsotemporal and dorsonasal incisions, respectively. Repeated measures analyses were used between time points and paired t test compared SIA between eyes.
RESULTS: Complete imaging series were obtained for seven patients. Follow-up imaging occurred at a median of 112 days (range 60-132 days) post-operatively. For repeated measures analyses, significant differences were found between pre- and immediate post-operative values (P < 0.01), and between immediate post-operative and follow-up values (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between pre-operative and follow-up values. Surgically induced astigmatism was significantly different between right and left eyes, with values of 2.01 ± 1.24 D and 3.05 ± 1.58 D at 3 mm radius (P < 0.05), and 2.04 ± 1.18 D and 3.06 ± 1.27 D at 4 mm radius (P < 0.05) for dorsotemporal and dorsonasal incisions, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary investigation revealed improvement of corneal SIA 2-4 months post-operatively, but development of significantly more SIA in dorsonasal vs dorsotemporal incisions. This prompts consideration of patient or microscope rotation to create a more dorsotemporal incision when possible.