Journal of ophthalmology · 2018
Comparison of Color Light-Emitting Diode Corneal Topographer and Dual Rotating Scheimpflug-Placido Topographer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jae Hyuck, Lee Yong Woo, Lee Jong Soo, Knorz Michael C, Auffarth Gerd U, Choi Chul Young
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare measurements of anterior and posterior keratometric values, using a color light-emitting diode corneal topographer and a dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido topographer.
METHODS: Anterior and posterior corneal index measurements were performed using a color light-emitting diode corneal topographer (Cassini) and a dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Galilei G4) and then compared. The paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between measurements.
RESULTS: Sixty postrefractive surgery eyes and 60 normal eyes were evaluated. Both the color light-emitting diode corneal topographer and the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido topographer provided highly repeatable corneal measurements (ICC > 0.969). The agreement levels between the 2 devices for anterior corneal power, astigmatism magnitude, and J0 and J45 values were ICC > 0.906 for the total group. However, the ICC values for posterior corneal power, astigmatism magnitude, and J0 and J45 values were lower than 0.681 for the total group.
CONCLUSIONS: The anterior keratometric values obtained by the color light-emitting diode corneal topographer and the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido topographer showed high agreement levels, but the posterior keratometric values showed lower agreement levels.
METHODS: Anterior and posterior corneal index measurements were performed using a color light-emitting diode corneal topographer (Cassini) and a dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Galilei G4) and then compared. The paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between measurements.
RESULTS: Sixty postrefractive surgery eyes and 60 normal eyes were evaluated. Both the color light-emitting diode corneal topographer and the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido topographer provided highly repeatable corneal measurements (ICC > 0.969). The agreement levels between the 2 devices for anterior corneal power, astigmatism magnitude, and J0 and J45 values were ICC > 0.906 for the total group. However, the ICC values for posterior corneal power, astigmatism magnitude, and J0 and J45 values were lower than 0.681 for the total group.
CONCLUSIONS: The anterior keratometric values obtained by the color light-emitting diode corneal topographer and the dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido topographer showed high agreement levels, but the posterior keratometric values showed lower agreement levels.