Annales de chirurgie · 1999
[Preoperative radiotherapy of rectal cancer. The Lyons experience, 1985-1996. Prognostic study apropos of 312 patients].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gérard J P, Chapet O, Morignat E, Romestaing P, Mornex F, Acharki A
Аннотация
AIM OF STUDY: Preoperative radiotherapy is used increasingly in rectal cancer in Europe. This study is a retrospective analysis of a series of 312 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by preoperative radiotherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: From 1985 to 1996, 312 patients were included in this study. Preoperative staging was: T2: 83, T3: 192 et T4: 21. On digital rectal examination, 25 patients were classified as N1. Endorectal sonographic staging was: uT1: 3, uT2: 77, uT3: 163, uN0: 122, uN1-2: 127. After surgery, pathological staging was: pT0: 43 (14%), pT1 24, pT2: 81, pT3: 151, pN0: 229, pN1-2: 81. Radiotherapy was delivered to the posterior pelvis with an accelerated schedule 39 Gy/13 fractions/17 days with x 18 MV.
RESULTS: Median follow-up is 54 months. For pM0 patients (297 patients), the overall 5-year survival rate is 67%. Local failure rate is 9%. Since 1986, the rate of sphincter saving surgery is close to 65%. Various parameters related to the tumor were found to be significant prognostic factors on multivariate analysis in relation to 5-year overall survival rate: the T stage as judged by digital rectal examination and endorectal sonography, the N stage as evaluated on digital rectal examination but not with endorectal sonography. Pathological examination of the operative specimen retains a very strong prognostic value for pT and pN.
CONCLUSION: Pathological examination of the specimen of rectal carcinoma retains a very strong prognostic value after preoperative radiation therapy. Endorectal sonography is of interest to evaluate T staging of the tumor but is not reliable for N stage.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: From 1985 to 1996, 312 patients were included in this study. Preoperative staging was: T2: 83, T3: 192 et T4: 21. On digital rectal examination, 25 patients were classified as N1. Endorectal sonographic staging was: uT1: 3, uT2: 77, uT3: 163, uN0: 122, uN1-2: 127. After surgery, pathological staging was: pT0: 43 (14%), pT1 24, pT2: 81, pT3: 151, pN0: 229, pN1-2: 81. Radiotherapy was delivered to the posterior pelvis with an accelerated schedule 39 Gy/13 fractions/17 days with x 18 MV.
RESULTS: Median follow-up is 54 months. For pM0 patients (297 patients), the overall 5-year survival rate is 67%. Local failure rate is 9%. Since 1986, the rate of sphincter saving surgery is close to 65%. Various parameters related to the tumor were found to be significant prognostic factors on multivariate analysis in relation to 5-year overall survival rate: the T stage as judged by digital rectal examination and endorectal sonography, the N stage as evaluated on digital rectal examination but not with endorectal sonography. Pathological examination of the operative specimen retains a very strong prognostic value for pT and pN.
CONCLUSION: Pathological examination of the specimen of rectal carcinoma retains a very strong prognostic value after preoperative radiation therapy. Endorectal sonography is of interest to evaluate T staging of the tumor but is not reliable for N stage.