Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2002
Early gastric carcinoma: spread and multicentricity.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huguier Michel, Ferro Leonardo, Barrier Alain
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In early gastric carcinoma (EGC), after subtotal gastrectomy, recurrent lesions limited to the gastric remnant are the cause of about 20% of deaths from recurrence. Therefore, it has been suggested to perform total gastrectomy in all cases of EGC.
METHODS: We studied a case series of 82 consecutive patients operated on for an EGC, with a mean follow-up time of 72 months (range, 1-120 months). Subtotal distal gastrectomy was performed 61 patients, total gastrectomy in 15, and other procedures in 6. Outcome measures were recurrence and causes of mortality, focusing on patients with resection line involvement and multifocal lesions.
RESULTS: EGC was limited to the mucosa in 43 patients and had invaded the submucosa in 39. Ten patients had a lymph node involvement. In 4 patients having had a subtotal gastrectomy, resection line involvement was detected. In 3 patients, the involvement was detected peroperatively on frozen sections, and a re-resection was performed. In the fourth patient, the involvement was detected postoperatively, but follow-up endoscopies failed to show any residual tumor. In 17 patients, multifocal lesions were observed. No recurrence was observed in the gastric remnant of patients having undergone a subtotal gastrectomy.
CONCLUSION: In distal EGC, a subtotal gastrectomy may be performed under two conditions: (1) careful endoscopic and peroperative examination of the upper part of the stomach to detect multifocal lesions and (2) a systematic frozen-section assessment of the resection margin to avoid inadequate resection.
METHODS: We studied a case series of 82 consecutive patients operated on for an EGC, with a mean follow-up time of 72 months (range, 1-120 months). Subtotal distal gastrectomy was performed 61 patients, total gastrectomy in 15, and other procedures in 6. Outcome measures were recurrence and causes of mortality, focusing on patients with resection line involvement and multifocal lesions.
RESULTS: EGC was limited to the mucosa in 43 patients and had invaded the submucosa in 39. Ten patients had a lymph node involvement. In 4 patients having had a subtotal gastrectomy, resection line involvement was detected. In 3 patients, the involvement was detected peroperatively on frozen sections, and a re-resection was performed. In the fourth patient, the involvement was detected postoperatively, but follow-up endoscopies failed to show any residual tumor. In 17 patients, multifocal lesions were observed. No recurrence was observed in the gastric remnant of patients having undergone a subtotal gastrectomy.
CONCLUSION: In distal EGC, a subtotal gastrectomy may be performed under two conditions: (1) careful endoscopic and peroperative examination of the upper part of the stomach to detect multifocal lesions and (2) a systematic frozen-section assessment of the resection margin to avoid inadequate resection.