The Laryngoscope · 2002
Preoperative versus postoperative role of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in cerebellopontine angle tumor.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Cheng-Wei, Young Yi-Ho, Tseng Ham-Min
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) examination was performed on patients with a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor to evaluate its clinical role.
METHODS: Patients with a CPA tumor were subjected to caloric test and VEMP examination. Follow-up study was performed 1 year after the surgery.
RESULTS: Six (69%) of the 9 tumors did not exhibit either caloric response or VEMP on the lesioned side. Three patients received tumor excision and all tumors involved both the superior and inferior vestibular nerves. Two (22%) of the 9 tumors had normal caloric responses but no VEMP. One underwent surgical excision, and the tumor originated from the inferior vestibular nerve. In the follow-up study, only 1 patient with epidermoid cyst presented complete recovery of caloric response and VEMP, whereas in the other 3 patients with vestibular schwannoma, the responses were all absent persistently.
CONCLUSION: Before surgery, VEMP test can be used to predict the nerve of origin and to formulate the best surgical approach. After surgery, VEMP test can be used to define the nature of the tumor (compressing or infiltrating the nerve) and disclose the residual function of the inferior vestibular nerve.
METHODS: Patients with a CPA tumor were subjected to caloric test and VEMP examination. Follow-up study was performed 1 year after the surgery.
RESULTS: Six (69%) of the 9 tumors did not exhibit either caloric response or VEMP on the lesioned side. Three patients received tumor excision and all tumors involved both the superior and inferior vestibular nerves. Two (22%) of the 9 tumors had normal caloric responses but no VEMP. One underwent surgical excision, and the tumor originated from the inferior vestibular nerve. In the follow-up study, only 1 patient with epidermoid cyst presented complete recovery of caloric response and VEMP, whereas in the other 3 patients with vestibular schwannoma, the responses were all absent persistently.
CONCLUSION: Before surgery, VEMP test can be used to predict the nerve of origin and to formulate the best surgical approach. After surgery, VEMP test can be used to define the nature of the tumor (compressing or infiltrating the nerve) and disclose the residual function of the inferior vestibular nerve.