Annales de chirurgie · 2000
[Conization with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted?].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bretelle F, Cravello L, Yang L, Benmoura D, Roger V, Blanc B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To define recommended treatment in cases of positive margins on cone biopsy specimens.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study concerned 220 conizations performed between January 1996 and June 1998. The results of 70 conizations (31.8%) with positive margins were analysed. There were 32 cold knife conizations (mean age: 43 years) and 38 conizations by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (mean age: 33 years).
RESULTS: Mean depth of conization was 15.94 mm for cold knife conization and 10.08 mm for loop electrosurgical conization. Fifteen patients were excluded (5 with invasive cancer and 10 were lost to follow-up). This study included 55 patients with a mean 12-month follow-up. Six underwent hysterectomy for mini-invasion on the specimen or advanced age. Eleven underwent a second conization (followed by hysterectomy in 2 cases). The other 38 patients were submitted to simple surveillance with cervico-vaginal cytology and colposcopic examination. The rate of residual lesions (cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: CIN 3) after conization with positive margin was 14.5% (n = 8).
CONCLUSION: Residual persistent dysplasia is not present in all patients after conization with positive margins. Cytology and colposcopy allow detection of dysplasia, indicating the need for a second conization. In women with no desire for further pregnancy, systematic repeat surgery must be recommended.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study concerned 220 conizations performed between January 1996 and June 1998. The results of 70 conizations (31.8%) with positive margins were analysed. There were 32 cold knife conizations (mean age: 43 years) and 38 conizations by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (mean age: 33 years).
RESULTS: Mean depth of conization was 15.94 mm for cold knife conization and 10.08 mm for loop electrosurgical conization. Fifteen patients were excluded (5 with invasive cancer and 10 were lost to follow-up). This study included 55 patients with a mean 12-month follow-up. Six underwent hysterectomy for mini-invasion on the specimen or advanced age. Eleven underwent a second conization (followed by hysterectomy in 2 cases). The other 38 patients were submitted to simple surveillance with cervico-vaginal cytology and colposcopic examination. The rate of residual lesions (cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: CIN 3) after conization with positive margin was 14.5% (n = 8).
CONCLUSION: Residual persistent dysplasia is not present in all patients after conization with positive margins. Cytology and colposcopy allow detection of dysplasia, indicating the need for a second conization. In women with no desire for further pregnancy, systematic repeat surgery must be recommended.