Annals of plastic surgery · 2007
A new flap for reconstruction of pilonidal sinus: lumbar adipofascial turnover flap.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Turan Aydin, Isler Can, Baş Serap C, Genç Bulent, Ozsoy Zafer
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: "Adipofascial turnover flap" is a well-known procedure, but it is generally not used for the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. The "lumbar adipofascial turnover flap" has been used in this study for the reconstruction of uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease.
METHODS: Ten cases (8 male and 2 female patients) were operated on by this technique. The reconstruction was performed with the lumbar adipofascial turnover flap. The flap sizes ranged from 4 x 7 cm to 5 x 9 cm (mean, 4.5 x 8 cm), and they were elevated with length-to-base ratio below 2:1. The follow-up period was 14 to 26 months.
RESULTS: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan, and power Doppler ultrasound examinations revealed viability of the flaps in all patients. There was no distortion of anatomic landmarks in any of the cases. The esthetic results were satisfying for all patients as well. There was no recurrence in any cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The hospital stay and mean time off work were shorter compared with other methods of reconstruction and there was no recurrence. We advocate that the lumbar adipofascial turnover flap is an excellent choice for reconstruction of cases with uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease.
METHODS: Ten cases (8 male and 2 female patients) were operated on by this technique. The reconstruction was performed with the lumbar adipofascial turnover flap. The flap sizes ranged from 4 x 7 cm to 5 x 9 cm (mean, 4.5 x 8 cm), and they were elevated with length-to-base ratio below 2:1. The follow-up period was 14 to 26 months.
RESULTS: Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan, and power Doppler ultrasound examinations revealed viability of the flaps in all patients. There was no distortion of anatomic landmarks in any of the cases. The esthetic results were satisfying for all patients as well. There was no recurrence in any cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The hospital stay and mean time off work were shorter compared with other methods of reconstruction and there was no recurrence. We advocate that the lumbar adipofascial turnover flap is an excellent choice for reconstruction of cases with uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease.