The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023
Aortic root geometry following composite valve graft implantation: Implications for future valve-in-valve procedures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Werner Paul, Kuscu Begüm Sena, Coti Iuliana, Puchner Stefan, Loewe Christian, Schmaranzer Florian, Ad Niv, Laufer Günther, Andreas Martin, Ehrlich Marek
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Biological composite valve grafts (CVGs) are being performed more frequently, which increases the need for interventions treating bioprosthetic valve failure. The feasibility of valve-in-valve procedures in this population is uncertain. This study aimed to assess changes in aortic root geometry and coronary height following CVG implantation to better understand future interventions.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 64 patients following bioprosthetic CVG replacement with pre- and postoperative computed tomography angiography. Root assessment was conducted as in preprocedural transcatheter aortic valve evaluation using a virtual valve simulation.
RESULTS: In 64 patients (age, 67.6 ± 9.3 years; 76.6% men) the preoperative coronary height was 14.3 ± 6.8 mm for the left coronary artery (LCA) and 17.9 ± 5.9 mm for the right coronary artery (RCA), which significantly decreased after CVG implantation, with 8.7 ± 4.4 mm for the LCA and 11.3 ± 4.4 mm for the RCA (P < .001). The virtual valve-to-coronary distances measured 4.0 ± 1.3 mm (LCA) and 4.6 ± 1.4 mm (RCA). Overall, 59.4% (n = 38) of patients with bio-CVGs would have been at risk for coronary obstruction, 29.7% (n = 19) for LCA, 10.9% (n = 7) for RCA, and 18.8% (n = 12) for combined LCA and RCA.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary height significantly decreased following CVG implantation. The majority of patients after bio-CVG were at a potential risk for coronary obstruction in future valve-in-valve procedures. Further studies are needed to identify the best possible technique for coronary reimplantation and other measures to diminish the risk for future coronary obstruction in this population.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 64 patients following bioprosthetic CVG replacement with pre- and postoperative computed tomography angiography. Root assessment was conducted as in preprocedural transcatheter aortic valve evaluation using a virtual valve simulation.
RESULTS: In 64 patients (age, 67.6 ± 9.3 years; 76.6% men) the preoperative coronary height was 14.3 ± 6.8 mm for the left coronary artery (LCA) and 17.9 ± 5.9 mm for the right coronary artery (RCA), which significantly decreased after CVG implantation, with 8.7 ± 4.4 mm for the LCA and 11.3 ± 4.4 mm for the RCA (P < .001). The virtual valve-to-coronary distances measured 4.0 ± 1.3 mm (LCA) and 4.6 ± 1.4 mm (RCA). Overall, 59.4% (n = 38) of patients with bio-CVGs would have been at risk for coronary obstruction, 29.7% (n = 19) for LCA, 10.9% (n = 7) for RCA, and 18.8% (n = 12) for combined LCA and RCA.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary height significantly decreased following CVG implantation. The majority of patients after bio-CVG were at a potential risk for coronary obstruction in future valve-in-valve procedures. Further studies are needed to identify the best possible technique for coronary reimplantation and other measures to diminish the risk for future coronary obstruction in this population.