Journal of the neurological sciences · 2017
Usefulness of platelet to lymphocyte and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios in predicting the presence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and in-hospital major adverse cerebral events.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akboga Yesim Eylev, Bektas Hesna, Anlar Omer
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as recently emerging thrombo-inflammatory indicators were significantly associated with both major cerebrovascular/cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effects of combinations of PLR and NLR in predicting the presence of CVST and in-hospital MACE.
METHODS: A total of 277 participants comprising 80 patients with evidence of CVST and 197 controls with similar baseline characteristics were included in this retrospective study. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the optimal cut-off values of PLR and NLR calculated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for in-hospital MACE rates.
RESULTS: PLR (148±61 vs 101±50, p<0.001) and NLR (3.12±1.4 vs 1.94±1.1, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the CVST group. Furthermore, patients in the high risk group (a PLR of ≥115.0 and an NLR of ≥2.1) had the highest in-hospital MACE rates including seizure (p=0.012), papilledema (p=0.025) and diplopia or blurry vision (p=0.028). After multivariate logistic regression analysis MPV, PLR (1.052 [1.045-1.059], p=0.001) and NLR (1.442 [1.086-1.916], p=0.012) were found as independent predictors of CVST.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PLR and NLR are easily available and cheap thrombo-inflammatory indicators, so that PLR and NLR could be used in prediction of CVST and in-hospital MACE.
METHODS: A total of 277 participants comprising 80 patients with evidence of CVST and 197 controls with similar baseline characteristics were included in this retrospective study. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the optimal cut-off values of PLR and NLR calculated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for in-hospital MACE rates.
RESULTS: PLR (148±61 vs 101±50, p<0.001) and NLR (3.12±1.4 vs 1.94±1.1, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the CVST group. Furthermore, patients in the high risk group (a PLR of ≥115.0 and an NLR of ≥2.1) had the highest in-hospital MACE rates including seizure (p=0.012), papilledema (p=0.025) and diplopia or blurry vision (p=0.028). After multivariate logistic regression analysis MPV, PLR (1.052 [1.045-1.059], p=0.001) and NLR (1.442 [1.086-1.916], p=0.012) were found as independent predictors of CVST.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PLR and NLR are easily available and cheap thrombo-inflammatory indicators, so that PLR and NLR could be used in prediction of CVST and in-hospital MACE.