European journal of clinical nutrition · 2007
Effect of intradialytic parenteral nutrition in patients with malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome on body weight, inflammation, serum lipids and adipocytokines: results from a pilot study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Joannidis M, Rauchenzauner M, Leiner B, Rosenkranz A, Ebenbichler C F, Laimer M, Tatarczyk T, Meusburger E, Mayer G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the influence of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) in patients suffering from Malnutrition-Inflammation Complex Syndrome (MICS) on nutritional status, inflammation, adipocytokines and serum lipids.
SUBJECTS: Six patients with MICS were assigned to IDPN, whereas six patients matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and co-morbidity without malnutrition served as controls. Patients were recruited from Outpatient Dialysis Unit, Medical University Innsbruck and from Dialysis Unit, Hospital Feldkirch.
RESULTS: In all patients with IDPN, dry body weight increased during the interventional period whereas body weight remained stable in patients without IDPN. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha levels were higher in patients with MICS compared with controls at all time points. Total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-levels significantly increased during dialysis at all time points in controls but not in patients with MICS. Albumin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and adipocytokines did not differ between patients and controls during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: IDPN in patients with MICS increases body weight despite not influencing inflammatory status. Furthermore, IDPN does not induce a pro-atherogenic lipid composition enhancing the risk for atherosclerosis. Thus, IDPN is a safe and effective treatment of malnutrition in patients with MICS.
SUBJECTS: Six patients with MICS were assigned to IDPN, whereas six patients matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and co-morbidity without malnutrition served as controls. Patients were recruited from Outpatient Dialysis Unit, Medical University Innsbruck and from Dialysis Unit, Hospital Feldkirch.
RESULTS: In all patients with IDPN, dry body weight increased during the interventional period whereas body weight remained stable in patients without IDPN. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha levels were higher in patients with MICS compared with controls at all time points. Total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-levels significantly increased during dialysis at all time points in controls but not in patients with MICS. Albumin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and adipocytokines did not differ between patients and controls during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: IDPN in patients with MICS increases body weight despite not influencing inflammatory status. Furthermore, IDPN does not induce a pro-atherogenic lipid composition enhancing the risk for atherosclerosis. Thus, IDPN is a safe and effective treatment of malnutrition in patients with MICS.