Current eye research · 2025
Assessing the Impact of AI-Assisted Portable Slit Lamps on Rural Primary Ophthalmic Medical Service.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Sile, Yan Chunhong, Qin Guanghao, Pazo Emmanuel Eric, He Xiangdong, Qi Peng, Li Mingze, Han Dongming, He Wei, He Xingru
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of an AI-assisted portable slit lamp (iSpector) and basic ophthalmology training on cataract detection, referral, and surgery rate in rural areas.
METHODS: This randomized control trial randomly assigned 63 village doctors to either the AI-assisted group (providing iSpector and training) or the control group (providing training). Doctors were followed for 1 year before intervention as a baseline and 1 year after to make the comparison. Multivariable Poisson regression was applied to compare the difference in cataract detection, referral, and surgery rate between the two groups, adjusted for primary doctors' baseline characteristics. We further conducted subgroup analysis to estimate the change after the intervention.
RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the detection, referral, and surgery rate of cataracts among the AI-assisted group was comparable, 1.7 times higher, and 4.9 times higher, respectively. Providing iSpector and training increased the detection, referral, and surgery rate of cataracts. However, only based on training to elevate the detection rate of cataracts did not change the referral and surgery rate.
CONCLUSIONS: iSpector helps village doctors detect and refer cataract patients appropriately, thus increasing the probability that patients receive cataract surgery.
METHODS: This randomized control trial randomly assigned 63 village doctors to either the AI-assisted group (providing iSpector and training) or the control group (providing training). Doctors were followed for 1 year before intervention as a baseline and 1 year after to make the comparison. Multivariable Poisson regression was applied to compare the difference in cataract detection, referral, and surgery rate between the two groups, adjusted for primary doctors' baseline characteristics. We further conducted subgroup analysis to estimate the change after the intervention.
RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the detection, referral, and surgery rate of cataracts among the AI-assisted group was comparable, 1.7 times higher, and 4.9 times higher, respectively. Providing iSpector and training increased the detection, referral, and surgery rate of cataracts. However, only based on training to elevate the detection rate of cataracts did not change the referral and surgery rate.
CONCLUSIONS: iSpector helps village doctors detect and refer cataract patients appropriately, thus increasing the probability that patients receive cataract surgery.