MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2340/0001555577149153

Медицинская библиотека · Acta dermato-venereologica · 1997

Patch testing with markers of fragrance contact allergy. Do clinical tests correspond to patients' self-reported problems?

Johansen J D, Andersen T F, Veien N, Avnstorp C, Andersen K E, Menné T

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between patients' own recognition of skin problems using consumer products and the results of patch testing with markers of fragrance sensitization. Eight hundred and eighty-four consecutive eczema patients, 18-69 years of age, filled in a questionnaire prior to patch testing with the European standard series. The questionnaire contained questions about skin symptoms from the use of scented and unscented products as well as skin reactions from contact with spices, flowers and citrus fruits that could indicate fragrance sensitivity. A highly significant association was found between reporting a history of visible skin symptoms from using scented products and a positive patch test to the fragrance mix, whereas no such relationship could be established to the Peru balsam in univariate or multivariate analysis. Our results suggest that the role of Peru balsam in detecting relevant fragrance contact allergy is limited, while most fragrance mix-positive patients are aware that the use of scented products may cause skin problems.

Для цитирования: Johansen J D, Andersen T F, Veien N, Avnstorp C, Andersen K E, Menné T. Patch testing with markers of fragrance contact allergy. Do clinical tests correspond to patients' self-reported problems?. Acta dermato-venereologica. 1997. DOI: 10.2340/0001555577149153.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.