DOI 10.1007/s10840-019-00585-0
Japan ablation registry: cryoablation in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ("JARCANRET study"): results from large multicenter retrospective investigation.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Cryoenergy has been demonstrated to be a safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation in patients with AVNRT.
METHODS
A multicenter retrospective study was performed. Two hundred eighty-three consecutive patients with AVNRT underwent cryoablation. Cryomapping at - 30 °C and - 80 °C was performed to predict cryoablation outcome and ascertain antegrade conduction. Cryoenergy was delivered subsequently at the same spot (cryoablation at - 80 °C) for 240 s.
RESULTS
Ablation procedure was acutely successful in 281 out of 283 patients (99.3%). Of note, 22 patients (10.1%) had transient AV block during the cryoablation, but no injurious effects on AV conduction were provoked during cryomapping. During a follow-up period of 367 ± 35 days, the recurrence rate was 3.9% (11 out of 281). There were no significant differences among the patients with a complete elimination of slow pathway conduction, AH jump without an echo beat, and AH jump with a single echo beat, in terms of the long-term recurrence of AVNRT.
CONCLUSIONS
Cryoablation of AVNRT appears to be effective both acutely and during the long-term with a minimal risk of unwanted injuries to the conduction system. It seems to be important to monitor the antegrade conduction during cryoenergy applications, even when cryomapping demonstrates a safe location for cryoablation. The recurrence rate of AVNRT did not differ according to the properties of the residual slow pathway conduction.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.