Terapevticheskii arkhiv · 2019
New ECG criteria for differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardias with right bundle branch block pattern.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shlevkov N B, Salami H F, Kiktev V G, Sokolov S F
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate standard 12-lead ECG indices for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS tachycardias with right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study analyses the 244 ECG indices in 111 patients (79 males and 32 females, age 53±17 years) with RBBB tachycardias, who underwent electrophysiological studies. First step includes retrospective analysis of QRS characteristics in 20 patients with ventricular tachycardias (VT), 24 pts with aberrant supraventricular tachycardias (SVT+RBBB) and 14 pts with antidromic SVTs (WPW). ROC- and multifactorial analyses were performed to develop diagnostic ECG algorithms. The prognostic accuracy of the algorithms was subsequently evaluated on a prospective group of patients with RBBB tachycardias (n=53).
RESULTS: ECG criteria of RBBB VTs were: 1) the presence Q-wave in lead II, 2) the duration interval R(peak)-S(end) >100 ms in lead V5. ECG criteria for antidromic SVTs with RBBB were: 1) the duration of the R wave in lead I ≥80 ms, 2) the absence of split (M-sharp) R-waves in lead V2, 3) the absence notch in ascending S wave in lead aVL. The accuracy of the algorhythm for diagnostic of VTs with RBBB was 83% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 73%). The accuracy of the algorhythm for diagnostic of antidromic SVTs with RBBB was 91% (sensitivity 85%, specificity 96%).
CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithms are based on new ECG criteria for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complexes tachycardias with RBBB pattern, unlike the previous algorithms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study analyses the 244 ECG indices in 111 patients (79 males and 32 females, age 53±17 years) with RBBB tachycardias, who underwent electrophysiological studies. First step includes retrospective analysis of QRS characteristics in 20 patients with ventricular tachycardias (VT), 24 pts with aberrant supraventricular tachycardias (SVT+RBBB) and 14 pts with antidromic SVTs (WPW). ROC- and multifactorial analyses were performed to develop diagnostic ECG algorithms. The prognostic accuracy of the algorithms was subsequently evaluated on a prospective group of patients with RBBB tachycardias (n=53).
RESULTS: ECG criteria of RBBB VTs were: 1) the presence Q-wave in lead II, 2) the duration interval R(peak)-S(end) >100 ms in lead V5. ECG criteria for antidromic SVTs with RBBB were: 1) the duration of the R wave in lead I ≥80 ms, 2) the absence of split (M-sharp) R-waves in lead V2, 3) the absence notch in ascending S wave in lead aVL. The accuracy of the algorhythm for diagnostic of VTs with RBBB was 83% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 73%). The accuracy of the algorhythm for diagnostic of antidromic SVTs with RBBB was 91% (sensitivity 85%, specificity 96%).
CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithms are based on new ECG criteria for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complexes tachycardias with RBBB pattern, unlike the previous algorithms.