Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal · 2019
Safety steps for a non-fluoroscopic approach in right-sided electrophysiology procedures: A point of view.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zoppo Franco, Licciardello Claudia, Favaro Giulia, Scalon Alessandra, Bacchiega Enrico, Lupo Antonio, Mugnai Giacomo, Zerbo Francesca
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Electro-anatomic 3D mapping systems enable the fluoroscopy (FL) exposure to be reduced. In right-heart supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) procedures, FL could potentially be avoided. Our aim was to discuss some steps focusing on safety.
METHODS AND RESULTS: The patient cohort comprised 70 consecutive SVT patients who underwent electrophysiologic (EP) catheterization. FL was routinely avoided in all cases (54.2% males, age 57.2 ± 13.3 years): 51 ablations and 19 EP study procedures. The Carto®3 (Biosense Webster) mapping system was used in 17/70 cases (24.3%), and the EnSite Precision™ (Abbott) system in the remaining 53/70 (75.7%). The mean procedure time was 94.1 ± 33.2 min; no FL was used. No major complications occurred. Acute procedural success was achieved in all 51 patients who underwent ablation. Over 3-month follow-up, arrhythmia recurred in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in procedural times between the two mapping systems, except for the time dedicated to the full geometry creation, which was longer for the EnSite Precision™ system: 10 min (8.5-15 IQR) vs 8 min (5-10 IQR) for the Carto® system (p < 0.001) mainly due to the sub-diaphragmatic navigation. The following procedural steps were considered critical in order to safely avoid FL use: "loop" advancing of catheters, the use of a fixed intracardiac reference, His signal landmark centered maps and the careful acquisition of sub-diaphragmatic extracardiac geometry.
CONCLUSIONS: A routine zero X-ray approach by means of electro-anatomic 3D mapping systems is safe and effective in right-atrium procedures. Some ad-hoc discussed procedural steps may enhance safety.
METHODS AND RESULTS: The patient cohort comprised 70 consecutive SVT patients who underwent electrophysiologic (EP) catheterization. FL was routinely avoided in all cases (54.2% males, age 57.2 ± 13.3 years): 51 ablations and 19 EP study procedures. The Carto®3 (Biosense Webster) mapping system was used in 17/70 cases (24.3%), and the EnSite Precision™ (Abbott) system in the remaining 53/70 (75.7%). The mean procedure time was 94.1 ± 33.2 min; no FL was used. No major complications occurred. Acute procedural success was achieved in all 51 patients who underwent ablation. Over 3-month follow-up, arrhythmia recurred in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in procedural times between the two mapping systems, except for the time dedicated to the full geometry creation, which was longer for the EnSite Precision™ system: 10 min (8.5-15 IQR) vs 8 min (5-10 IQR) for the Carto® system (p < 0.001) mainly due to the sub-diaphragmatic navigation. The following procedural steps were considered critical in order to safely avoid FL use: "loop" advancing of catheters, the use of a fixed intracardiac reference, His signal landmark centered maps and the careful acquisition of sub-diaphragmatic extracardiac geometry.
CONCLUSIONS: A routine zero X-ray approach by means of electro-anatomic 3D mapping systems is safe and effective in right-atrium procedures. Some ad-hoc discussed procedural steps may enhance safety.