Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2018
Methotrexate for alopecia areata: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Phan Kevin, Ramachandran Vignesh, Sebaratnam Deshan Frank
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Methotrexate has been used both as monotherapy and as an adjunct to corticosteroids in the treatment of alopecia areata (AA), though there exists a paucity of definitive evidence and guidelines in this setting.
OBJECTIVES: To 1) determine the efficacy and risks associated with methotrexate therapy for AA, 2) determine the differences in efficacy of combination (methotrexate plus corticosteroids) versus stand-alone (methotrexate) treatment, and 3) determine the relative efficacy of methotrexate in adult versus pediatric populations.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to recommended PRISMA [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses] guidelines.
RESULTS: Methotrexate has reasonable effectiveness in patients with severe AA; adults appear to be more responsive to methotrexate treatment than pediatric patients. Combination treatment results in a higher complete response rate than methotrexate stand-alone treatment. A large proportion of patients had recurrence in the setting of tapering treatment. Complication rates were acceptable and similar between adult and pediatric patients.
LIMITATIONS: The studies reviewed were retrospective observational studies with heterogeneity between centers in terms of methotrexate dosages and protocols in use for AA, and there was a lack of data beyond 1 year for the adjunctive treatments.
CONCLUSION: Methotrexate is an effective monotherapy or adjunct therapy in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of severe AA.
OBJECTIVES: To 1) determine the efficacy and risks associated with methotrexate therapy for AA, 2) determine the differences in efficacy of combination (methotrexate plus corticosteroids) versus stand-alone (methotrexate) treatment, and 3) determine the relative efficacy of methotrexate in adult versus pediatric populations.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to recommended PRISMA [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses] guidelines.
RESULTS: Methotrexate has reasonable effectiveness in patients with severe AA; adults appear to be more responsive to methotrexate treatment than pediatric patients. Combination treatment results in a higher complete response rate than methotrexate stand-alone treatment. A large proportion of patients had recurrence in the setting of tapering treatment. Complication rates were acceptable and similar between adult and pediatric patients.
LIMITATIONS: The studies reviewed were retrospective observational studies with heterogeneity between centers in terms of methotrexate dosages and protocols in use for AA, and there was a lack of data beyond 1 year for the adjunctive treatments.
CONCLUSION: Methotrexate is an effective monotherapy or adjunct therapy in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of severe AA.