The British journal of surgery · 1997
Anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis: 10 years' experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Shoji Y, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Coloanal anastomosis and radiotherapy for the treatment of lower rectal carcinoma have been receiving increasing attention.
METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer were divided into two groups: anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis (CAA) plus preoperative intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) (group 1; 68 patients) and CAA without IBT (group 2; 23 patients). Group 3, comprising 59 patients who underwent abdominoperineal excision (APE), was examined as a control group. Comparative results were reviewed.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in group 1 than in group 2. Actuarial 5-year survival rates were 73 per cent in group 1, 64 per cent in group 2 and 63 per cent in group 3. Cumulative local recurrence rates at 5 years were 11 per cent in group 1, 38 per cent in group 2 and 21 per cent in group 3. Intestinal continuity breakdown was seen in 14 per cent of all patients at 5 years after initial operation.
CONCLUSION: The combination of CAA and preoperative IBT resulted in decreased local recurrence. IBT followed by CAA can be a good restorative option for combating lower rectal cancer.
METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer were divided into two groups: anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis (CAA) plus preoperative intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) (group 1; 68 patients) and CAA without IBT (group 2; 23 patients). Group 3, comprising 59 patients who underwent abdominoperineal excision (APE), was examined as a control group. Comparative results were reviewed.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in group 1 than in group 2. Actuarial 5-year survival rates were 73 per cent in group 1, 64 per cent in group 2 and 63 per cent in group 3. Cumulative local recurrence rates at 5 years were 11 per cent in group 1, 38 per cent in group 2 and 21 per cent in group 3. Intestinal continuity breakdown was seen in 14 per cent of all patients at 5 years after initial operation.
CONCLUSION: The combination of CAA and preoperative IBT resulted in decreased local recurrence. IBT followed by CAA can be a good restorative option for combating lower rectal cancer.