Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2010
Findings on serial surveillance colonoscopy in patients with low-risk polyps on initial colonoscopy.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miller Jocelyne, Mehta Neil, Feldman Michael, Furth Emma, Ginsberg Gregory G, Yang Yu-Xiao, Lewis James D
Аннотация
GOALS: This study describes the prevalence of adenomatous polyps at serial follow-up exams after a colonoscopy finding 1 to 2 small tubular adenomas.
STUDY: We conducted a retrospective cohort of patients with 1 to 2 small tubular adenomas on an initial colonoscopy who underwent at least 2 additional surveillance examinations. Our primary outcome was any or advanced adenomas on the third colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. At the second and third colonoscopy, 31/88 (35.2%) patients and 26/88 (29.6%) patients had at least 1 adenoma, respectively. Among the 28 patients with 1 to 2 small tubular adenomas on colonoscopy no. 2, the prevalence of any adenomas on colonoscopy no. 3 was 39.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.5%-59.4%]. Among the 56 patients without adenomas at colonoscopy no. 2, the prevalence of any and advanced adenomas on colonoscopy no. 3 was 25% (95% CI: 14.4%-38.4%), and 3.6% (95% CI: 0.4%-12.3%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with 1-2 small tubular adenomas on initial colonoscopy the prevalence of adenomas and advanced lesions on the third colonoscopy remains high even if no adenomas are found on the second colonoscopy.
STUDY: We conducted a retrospective cohort of patients with 1 to 2 small tubular adenomas on an initial colonoscopy who underwent at least 2 additional surveillance examinations. Our primary outcome was any or advanced adenomas on the third colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. At the second and third colonoscopy, 31/88 (35.2%) patients and 26/88 (29.6%) patients had at least 1 adenoma, respectively. Among the 28 patients with 1 to 2 small tubular adenomas on colonoscopy no. 2, the prevalence of any adenomas on colonoscopy no. 3 was 39.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.5%-59.4%]. Among the 56 patients without adenomas at colonoscopy no. 2, the prevalence of any and advanced adenomas on colonoscopy no. 3 was 25% (95% CI: 14.4%-38.4%), and 3.6% (95% CI: 0.4%-12.3%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with 1-2 small tubular adenomas on initial colonoscopy the prevalence of adenomas and advanced lesions on the third colonoscopy remains high even if no adenomas are found on the second colonoscopy.