Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2019
P-wave vector magnitude predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakatani Yosuke, Sakamoto Tamotsu, Yamaguchi Yoshiaki, Tsujino Yasushi, Kataoka Naoya, Kinugawa Koichiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The predictive efficacies of parameters related to P-wave amplitude (PWA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation are unclear.
METHODS: We measured multiple PWA parameters using an automated system in 126 consecutive patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF who underwent catheter ablation. The relationships between AF recurrence and various PWA parameters were examined, including the association with P-wave vector magnitude (calculated as the square root of the sum of lead II PWA squared, lead V6 PWA squared, and a one-half lead V2 PWA squared).
RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation did not recur in 87 patients (69%) during 32 ± 15 months of follow-up. The maximum PWA, mean PWA, and P-wave vector magnitude were lower in patients with AF recurrence than those without (maximum PWA, 0.14 ± 0.05 mV vs. 0.16 ± 0.05 mV, p = 0.017; mean PWA, 0.05 ± 0.02 mV vs. 0.06 ± 0.02 mV, p = 0.003; P-wave vector magnitude, 0.09 ± 0.03 mV vs. 0.13 ± 0.04 mV, p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the predictive ability of P-wave vector magnitude for AF recurrence was independent of other clinical properties (hazard ratio: 0.153, 95% confidence interval: 0.046-0.507, p = 0.002). Atrial fibrillation freedom rates of patients with P-wave vector magnitude higher and lower than 0.13 mV were 93% and 57%, respectively. P-wave vector magnitude weakly correlated with left atrial dimension (R = -0.280, p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: P-wave vector magnitude can predict AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF.
METHODS: We measured multiple PWA parameters using an automated system in 126 consecutive patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF who underwent catheter ablation. The relationships between AF recurrence and various PWA parameters were examined, including the association with P-wave vector magnitude (calculated as the square root of the sum of lead II PWA squared, lead V6 PWA squared, and a one-half lead V2 PWA squared).
RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation did not recur in 87 patients (69%) during 32 ± 15 months of follow-up. The maximum PWA, mean PWA, and P-wave vector magnitude were lower in patients with AF recurrence than those without (maximum PWA, 0.14 ± 0.05 mV vs. 0.16 ± 0.05 mV, p = 0.017; mean PWA, 0.05 ± 0.02 mV vs. 0.06 ± 0.02 mV, p = 0.003; P-wave vector magnitude, 0.09 ± 0.03 mV vs. 0.13 ± 0.04 mV, p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the predictive ability of P-wave vector magnitude for AF recurrence was independent of other clinical properties (hazard ratio: 0.153, 95% confidence interval: 0.046-0.507, p = 0.002). Atrial fibrillation freedom rates of patients with P-wave vector magnitude higher and lower than 0.13 mV were 93% and 57%, respectively. P-wave vector magnitude weakly correlated with left atrial dimension (R = -0.280, p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: P-wave vector magnitude can predict AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF.