Journal of atrial fibrillation · 2018
Clinical Utility of Intravenous Nifekalant Injection during Radiofrequency catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kawaji Tetsuma, Shizuta Satoshi, Yamagami Shintaro, Aizawa Takanori, Komasa Akihiro, Yoshizawa Takashi, Kato Masashi, Yokomatsu Takafumi, Miki Shinji, Ono Koh, Kimura Takeshi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging even in RFCA-era for AF. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of nifekalant, a pure potassium channel blocker,during RFCA for persistent AF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively enrolled 157 consecutive persistentAF patientsundergoing first RFCA procedure withcomplex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)ablation after pulmonary veins isolation and compared outcomes between patientswith (NFK group: N=79) and without (No-NFK group: N=78)additional CFAE ablation using intravenous nifekalant (0.3mg/kg). Primary endpoint was 24-month atrial arrhythmia-free survival post ablation.The prevalence of AF terminationwas significantly higher in NFK group than No-NFK group (64.6% versus 7.7%, P<0.001). Arrhythmia-free survival, however, was not significantly different between 2 groups (61.5% versus 54.1%, P=0.63).There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the prevalence of recurrent atrial tachycardia(25.0% versus 23.5%, P=0.89). Arrhythmia-free survivalin patients with AF termination during procedure was significantly higher thanthose without (73.0% versus 41.0%, P=0.002; adjusted hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.84, P=0.02) amongNFK group,but not amongNo-NFK group (66.7% versus 53.2%, P=0.53).
CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous nifekalant injection during additional CFAE ablation did not improve sinus maintenancerate after RFCA procedure for AF, but AF termination by nifekalant injection could be a clinical predictor of better success rates after procedure.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively enrolled 157 consecutive persistentAF patientsundergoing first RFCA procedure withcomplex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)ablation after pulmonary veins isolation and compared outcomes between patientswith (NFK group: N=79) and without (No-NFK group: N=78)additional CFAE ablation using intravenous nifekalant (0.3mg/kg). Primary endpoint was 24-month atrial arrhythmia-free survival post ablation.The prevalence of AF terminationwas significantly higher in NFK group than No-NFK group (64.6% versus 7.7%, P<0.001). Arrhythmia-free survival, however, was not significantly different between 2 groups (61.5% versus 54.1%, P=0.63).There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the prevalence of recurrent atrial tachycardia(25.0% versus 23.5%, P=0.89). Arrhythmia-free survivalin patients with AF termination during procedure was significantly higher thanthose without (73.0% versus 41.0%, P=0.002; adjusted hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.84, P=0.02) amongNFK group,but not amongNo-NFK group (66.7% versus 53.2%, P=0.53).
CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous nifekalant injection during additional CFAE ablation did not improve sinus maintenancerate after RFCA procedure for AF, but AF termination by nifekalant injection could be a clinical predictor of better success rates after procedure.