MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0300060519879594

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of international medical research · 2019

Quantifying the number of lymph nodes for examination in breast cancer.

Sun Liping, Li Ping, Ren He, Liu Gang, Sun Lining

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Examining the correct number of lymph nodes when diagnosing breast cancer invasion is still a problem. This work aimed to develop a qualification model that estimates the possibility of missing nodes and the number of lymph nodes that need to be examined.

METHODS

By analyzing lymph node invasion of 303,760 breast cancer samples with primary tumor stage and the number of examined and positive lymph nodes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database using a beta-binomial model, the number of nodes that should be examined was quantified in different stages.

RESULTS

In general, to reduce the possibility of missing positive nodes to less than 10%, 21 lymph nodes should be examined; thus, the current median of dissected nodes (12) is not adequate. The number of nodes needed to be dissected for stages T1, T2, and T3 are 8, 37, and 87, respectively. Currently, the median number of node dissections for these stages were 12, 13, and 14, respectively. The clinical significance of the nodal staging score was validated with survival information.

CONCLUSION

Currently, the number of lymph nodes dissected in breast cancer are excessive for T1 but insufficient for T2 and T3.

Для цитирования: Sun Liping, Li Ping, Ren He, Liu Gang, Sun Lining. Quantifying the number of lymph nodes for examination in breast cancer.. The Journal of international medical research. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0300060519879594.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.