MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/153303460500400510

Медицинская библиотека · Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2005

Treating the contents and not the container: dosimetric study of hair-sparing whole brain intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Roberge David, Parker William, Niazi Tamim M, Olivares Marina

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Hematogenous metastatases are the most common adult central nervous system malignancies. The standard treatment of these patients continues to include whole brain radiation. An unavoidable toxicity of this treatment is acute iatrogenic alopecia. This alopecia is a significant cause of patient distress. Our purpose was to quantify the sparing of the hair bearing skin that could be achieved by using a complex hair-sparing approach. To achieve this goal, we treat an anthropomorphic phantom with both conventional and inverse-planned intensity-modulated portals. The skin dose was evaluated through dose-volume histograms and thermo-luminescent dosimetry. The median calculated dose was reduced by 38%. The average measured dose at five surface points was reduced by 53%--from 95% of the prescription dose with the conventional plan, to 44%, with the IMRT plan. This sparing was achieved while maintaining adequate target coverage. Because of the low radiation tolerance of the hair follicle, this dose reduction is not expected, on its own, to eliminate radiation alopecia but bears promise in combination with other toxicity-sparing strategies.

Для цитирования: Roberge David, Parker William, Niazi Tamim M, Olivares Marina. Treating the contents and not the container: dosimetric study of hair-sparing whole brain intensity modulated radiation therapy.. Technology in cancer research & treatment. 2005. DOI: 10.1177/153303460500400510.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.