Experimental eye research · 2025
Publicly available imaging datasets for age-related macular degeneration: Evaluation according to the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gim Nayoon, Ferguson Alina, Blazes Marian, Soundarajan Sanjay, Gasimova Aydan, Jiang Yu, Sánchez Clara I, Zalunardo Luca, Corradetti Giulia, Elze Tobias, Honda Naoto, Waheed Nadia K, Cairns Anne Marie, Canto-Soler M Valeria, Domalpally Amitha, Durbin Mary, Ferrara Daniela, Hu Jewel, Nair Prashant, Lee Aaron Y, Sadda Srinivas R, Keenan Tiarnan D L, Patel Bhavesh, Lee Cecilia S, Ryan Initiative For Macular Research (RIMR) Consortium
Аннотация
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of vision loss among older adults, affecting more than 200 million people worldwide. With no cure currently available and a rapidly increasing prevalence, emerging approaches such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold promise for advancing the study of AMD. The effective utilization of AI and ML in AMD research is highly dependent on access to high-quality and reusable clinical data. The Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles, published in 2016, provide a framework for sharing data that is easily useable by both humans and machines. However, it is unclear how these principles are implemented with regards to ophthalmic imaging datasets for AMD research. We evaluated openly available AMD-related datasets containing optical coherence tomography (OCT) data against the FAIR principles. The assessment revealed that none of the datasets were fully compliant with FAIR principles. Specifically, compliance rates were 5 % for Findable, 82 % for Accessible, 73 % for Interoperable, and 0 % for Reusable. The low compliance rates can be attributed to the relatively recent emergence of these principles and the lack of established standards for data and metadata formatting in the AMD research community. This article presents our findings and offers guidelines for adopting FAIR practices to enhance data sharing in AMD research.