Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019
Heterogeneous HIV-1 Reactivation Patterns of Disulfiram and Combined Disulfiram+Romidepsin Treatments.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kula Anna, Delacourt Nadège, Bouchat Sophie, Darcis Gilles, Avettand-Fenoel Veronique, Verdikt Roxane, Corazza Francis, Necsoi Coca, Vanhulle Caroline, Bendoumou Maryam, Burny Arsene, De Wit Stephane, Rouzioux Christine, Rohr Oliver, Van Lint Carine
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Few single latency-reversing agents (LRAs) have been tested in vivo, and only some of them have demonstrated an effect, albeit weak, on the decrease of latent reservoir. Therefore, other LRAs and combinations of LRAs need to be assessed. Here, we evaluated the potential of combined treatments of therapeutically promising LRAs, disulfiram and romidepsin.
SETTING AND METHODS: We assessed the reactivation potential of individual disulfiram or simultaneous or sequential combined treatments with romidepsin in vitro in latently infected cell lines of T-lymphoid and myeloid origins and in ex vivo cultures of CD8-depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from 18 HIV-1 combination antiretroviral therapy-treated individuals.
RESULTS: We demonstrated heterogeneous reactivation effects of disulfiram in vitro in various cell lines of myeloid origin and no latency reversal neither in vitro in T-lymphoid cells nor ex vivo, even if doses corresponding to maximal plasmatic concentration or higher were tested. Disulfiram+romidepsin combined treatments produced distinct reactivation patterns in vitro. Ex vivo, the combined treatments showed a modest reactivation effect when used simultaneously as opposed to no viral reactivation for the corresponding sequential treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive reactivation effects of disulfiram in myeloid latency cell lines suggest that disulfiram could be a potential LRA for this neglected reservoir. Moreover, distinct reactivation profiles pinpoint heterogeneity of the latent reservoir and confirm that the mechanisms that contribute to HIV latency are diverse. Importantly, disulfiram+romidepsin treatments are not potent ex vivo and most likely do not represent an effective drug combination to achieve high levels of latency reversal in vivo.
SETTING AND METHODS: We assessed the reactivation potential of individual disulfiram or simultaneous or sequential combined treatments with romidepsin in vitro in latently infected cell lines of T-lymphoid and myeloid origins and in ex vivo cultures of CD8-depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from 18 HIV-1 combination antiretroviral therapy-treated individuals.
RESULTS: We demonstrated heterogeneous reactivation effects of disulfiram in vitro in various cell lines of myeloid origin and no latency reversal neither in vitro in T-lymphoid cells nor ex vivo, even if doses corresponding to maximal plasmatic concentration or higher were tested. Disulfiram+romidepsin combined treatments produced distinct reactivation patterns in vitro. Ex vivo, the combined treatments showed a modest reactivation effect when used simultaneously as opposed to no viral reactivation for the corresponding sequential treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive reactivation effects of disulfiram in myeloid latency cell lines suggest that disulfiram could be a potential LRA for this neglected reservoir. Moreover, distinct reactivation profiles pinpoint heterogeneity of the latent reservoir and confirm that the mechanisms that contribute to HIV latency are diverse. Importantly, disulfiram+romidepsin treatments are not potent ex vivo and most likely do not represent an effective drug combination to achieve high levels of latency reversal in vivo.