Journal of neurology · 2024
GFAP and NfL as fluid biomarkers for clinical disease severity and disease progression in multiple system atrophy (MSA).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Katzdobler Sabrina, Nübling Georg, Klietz Martin, Fietzek Urban M, Palleis Carla, Bernhardt Alexander M, Wegner Florian, Huber Meret, Rogozinski Sophia, Schneider Luisa-Sophie, Spruth Eike Jakob, Beyle Aline, Vogt Ina R, Brandt Moritz, Hansen Niels, Glanz Wenzel, Brockmann Kathrin, Spottke Annika, Hoffmann Daniel C, Peters Oliver, Priller Josef, Wiltfang Jens, Düzel Emrah, Schneider Anja, Falkenburger Björn, Klockgether Thomas, Gasser Thomas, Nuscher Brigitte, Haass Christian, Höglinger Günter, Levin Johannes
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Multiple system atrophy (MSA), an atypical parkinsonian syndrome, is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease with currently no established fluid biomarkers available. MSA is characterized by an oligodendroglial α-synucleinopathy, progressive neuronal cell loss and concomitant astrocytosis. Here, we investigate glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) as fluid biomarkers for differential diagnosis, assessment of clinical disease severity and prediction of disease progression in MSA.
METHODS: GFAP and NfL levels were analyzed in plasma and CSF samples of 47 MSA patients as well as 24 Parkinson's disease (PD) and 25 healthy controls (HC) as reference cohorts. In MSA, biomarker levels were correlated to baseline and longitudinal clinical disease severity (UMSARS scores).
RESULTS: In MSA, GFAP levels in CSF and plasma predicted baseline clinical disease severity as indicated by UMSARS scores, while NfL levels predicted clinical disease progression as indicated by longitudinal changes in UMSARS scores. Cross-sectionally, NfL levels in CSF and plasma were significantly elevated in MSA compared to both PD and HC. Receiver operating curves (ROC) indicated high diagnostic accuracy of NfL for distinguishing MSA from PD (CSF: AUC = 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.00; plasma: AUC = 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-1.00).
DISCUSSION: In MSA, GFAP shows promise as novel biomarker for assessing current clinical disease severity, while NfL might serve as biomarker for prediction of disease progression and differential diagnosis of MSA against PD.
METHODS: GFAP and NfL levels were analyzed in plasma and CSF samples of 47 MSA patients as well as 24 Parkinson's disease (PD) and 25 healthy controls (HC) as reference cohorts. In MSA, biomarker levels were correlated to baseline and longitudinal clinical disease severity (UMSARS scores).
RESULTS: In MSA, GFAP levels in CSF and plasma predicted baseline clinical disease severity as indicated by UMSARS scores, while NfL levels predicted clinical disease progression as indicated by longitudinal changes in UMSARS scores. Cross-sectionally, NfL levels in CSF and plasma were significantly elevated in MSA compared to both PD and HC. Receiver operating curves (ROC) indicated high diagnostic accuracy of NfL for distinguishing MSA from PD (CSF: AUC = 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.00; plasma: AUC = 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-1.00).
DISCUSSION: In MSA, GFAP shows promise as novel biomarker for assessing current clinical disease severity, while NfL might serve as biomarker for prediction of disease progression and differential diagnosis of MSA against PD.