Medicina intensiva · 2013
[Ten-year evolution of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure in the hematogical patient admitted to the intensive care unit].
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Belenguer-Muncharaz A, Albert-Rodrigo L, Ferrandiz-Sellés A, Cebrián-Graullera G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: A comparison was made between invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in haematological patients with acute respiratory failure.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study was made from 2001 to December 2011.
SETTING: A clinical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary hospital.
PATIENTS: Patients with hematological malignancies suffering acute respiratory failure (ARF) and requiring mechanical ventilation in the form of either IMV or NPPV.
VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Analysis of infection and organ failure rates, duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stays, as well as ICU, hospital and mortality after 90 days. The same variables were analyzed in the comparison between NPPV success and failure.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included, of which 35 required IMV and 6 NPPV. ICU mortality was higher in the IMV group (100% vs 37% in NPPV, P=.006). The intubation rate in NPPV was 40%. Compared with successful NPPV, failure in the NPPV group involved more complications, a longer duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, and greater ICU and hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis of mortality in the NPPV group identified NPPV failure (OR 13 [95%CI 1.33-77.96], P=.008) and progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR 10 [95%CI 1.95-89.22], P=.03) as prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: The use of NPPV reduced mortality compared with IMV. NPPV failure was associated with more complications.
DESIGN: A retrospective observational study was made from 2001 to December 2011.
SETTING: A clinical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary hospital.
PATIENTS: Patients with hematological malignancies suffering acute respiratory failure (ARF) and requiring mechanical ventilation in the form of either IMV or NPPV.
VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Analysis of infection and organ failure rates, duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stays, as well as ICU, hospital and mortality after 90 days. The same variables were analyzed in the comparison between NPPV success and failure.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included, of which 35 required IMV and 6 NPPV. ICU mortality was higher in the IMV group (100% vs 37% in NPPV, P=.006). The intubation rate in NPPV was 40%. Compared with successful NPPV, failure in the NPPV group involved more complications, a longer duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, and greater ICU and hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis of mortality in the NPPV group identified NPPV failure (OR 13 [95%CI 1.33-77.96], P=.008) and progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR 10 [95%CI 1.95-89.22], P=.03) as prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: The use of NPPV reduced mortality compared with IMV. NPPV failure was associated with more complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute DiseaseAdultAgedBacteremiaFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealKaplan-Meier EstimateLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicMultiple Organ FailureNoninvasive VentilationPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesSpainTertiary Care CentersTreatment Failure